MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4394676643 · doi:10.5206/mirror.v44i1.17097

Turning Blind Eyes to Empty Stomachs

2024· article· en· W4394676643 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Katrina Crone

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Mirror - Undergraduate History Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueStoma care and complications
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOphthalmologyOptometryMedicineComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Between 1932 and 1933, the Soviet Union (USSR) experienced one of the worst famines recorded in European history.Yet, the vast majority of individuals across the globe were kept unaware of this tragedy, and many remain unaware to date.Throughout these two years, Joseph Stalin's USSR deliberately starved the Ukrainian countryside, causing the deaths of an estimated six to eight million Ukrainian peasants from hunger, malnutrition, and disease. 1 This event came to be known as the Holodomor, meaning 'death by hunger' in Ukrainian.Russian propaganda and international concern over diplomatic relations prevented western nations from sending aid to the famine victims and contributed to the widespread silence regarding the famine.Specifically, Stalin's refusal of aid and intentional censorship of the press meant that most of the world was oblivious to what was taking place in Ukraine.However, the governments of western nations, such as the United States, Britain, and Canada, were conscious of the famine.The nations refused to act, in an effort to maintain international political stability with the USSR.Continued Russian denial kept the true events of 1932 to 1933 obscured for many decades to follow.This attack on Ukrainian lives began with Stalin's Five-Year Plan.Introduced in 1928, the plan aimed to industrialize the nation, financed through forced savings from the peasants.The basis of the plan was collectivization: the process in which Ukrainian peasants were forced to give up their individual farms and join collective farms owned by the government.They were also required to pay higher rates for machinery, and sell their grain for lower prices.Further, they were forced to consume less of their production, so that the government could collect and sell excess grain abroad for a profit, and to invest into the nation's industry. 2By 1931, the state collection of crops was almost half of the total harvest.Farms that possessed seeds were forced to surrender them to the government for the next harvest, meaning that they had nothing left to consume or plant for themselves. 3Left with little but potatoes and beets, many resorted to slaughtering and eating their cattle.By 1932, the situation had only escalated.A diary entry from recorded in 1932, written by Holodomor survivor Oleksandra Radchenko, reads: "Famine, artificially created famine is taking on a nightmarish character.No one can understand why they are pumping out grain to the last kernel…and they nevertheless continue to demand grain for sowing and sowing material in general…And the children go hungry, worn out, emaciated, tormented by tapeworms, as they eat only sugar beets." 4 By 1933, according to a newspaper interview with an anonymous Ukrainian woman who had escaped: "There have been cases of a mother starving with her children and then killing and eating them when she sees that they are about to die.Or you are walking along the street and you see a corpse.You look around to see whether anyone is watching, and you cut off a piece of flesh and then bake or cook it." 5Collectivization and

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,205
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,060
Tête enseignante GPT0,326
Écart entre enseignants0,266 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Mirror - Undergraduate History JournalMême sujetStoma care and complicationsTravaux en français237 207