MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4394699900 · doi:10.1353/rvs.2023.a924219

Cervantes' Architectures: The Dangers Outside by Frederick A. de Armas (review)

2023· article· es· W4394699900 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Júlia Domínguez

Notice bibliographique

RevueRevista de estudios hispánicos · 2023
Typearticle
Languees
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Art and Architecture Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistoryPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Cervantes' Architectures: The Dangers Outside by Frederick A. de Armas Julia Domínguez de Armas, Frederick A. Cervantes' Architectures: The Dangers Outside. Toronto, U of Toronto P, 2022. 384 pp. Cervantes' Architectures: The Dangers Outside, the latest research monograph authored by Frederick A. de Armas, proves to be a profoundly enlightening and captivating piece of scholarly work. What sets this book apart is its distinct approach to examining the intricate interplay between Cervantes' narrative and architecture while also incorporating other notable aspects of Renaissance culture, including mythology, painting, the Art of Memory, astronomy, and philosophy. Cervantes' Architectures explores Cervantes' adeptness at seamlessly integrating the discipline of architecture, a preeminent and enriching aspect of the Renaissance, into the very fabric of his novels. Equally remarkable is de Armas' capacity to underscore the significance of Cervantes' achievements with considerable insight and erudition. By drawing upon diverse aesthetic domains and contemporary scholarship, de Armas skillfully interlaces a captivating analysis of Cervantes' literary works with Renaissance culture. He raises pertinent inquiries, such as the often-overlooked role of windows, open spaces, and inner places in Cervantes' narratives, prompting readers to contemplate why scholars have not thoroughly explored the interplay between architecture and Cervantes' storytelling. Notably, de Armas presents a counterargument to the prevailing belief that Cervantes lacked knowledge in architecture, proposing instead that the esteemed writer may have been familiar with architectural treatises of his time, consequently leaving an impact on the narrative and structure of his literary works. De Armas investigates Cervantes' prose, renowned for its ability to challenge readers and their perceptions of reality, by delving into intricate architectural frameworks that defy conventional notions of truthfulness. The book's objectives are clearly outlined in the introduction, reinforced in each individual chapter, and substantively developed through the analysis of literary works, episodes, and architectural wonders. It focuses primarily on specific passages in Cervantes' four novels: La Galatea (1585), Don Quixote I (1605), Don Quixote II (1615), and Persiles y Sigismunda (1616). Given the significance of Don Quixote as Cervantes' most notable work and a rich area for study, the manuscript dedicates four of its nine chapters to this novel. The central aim of this monograph is to envision the physical structures constructed by Cervantes in his fiction, and to explore how these images of habitation are conveyed to readers through the written word. In this pursuit, de Armas draws inspiration from the scholarly insights of Terence Cave and undertakes a thorough examination of various spatial elements present in Cervantes' novels. Additionally, de Armas integrates perspectives from modern architects like Frank Lloyd Wright and Juhani Pallasmaa to shed light on Cervantes' relationship with both classical architectural traditions and visionary possibilities of the future. De Armas meticulously demonstrates that Cervantes' fictional spaces often remain in a state of non-existence, unconstructed, deliberately leaving them open to interpretation and imagination. This literary strategy encourages readers to interact with the inherent architectonic potential within Cervantes' narratives. [End Page 662] A substantial portion of the manuscript is devoted to an examination of the portrayal of characters, like Don Quixote, and their creative envisioning and constructing of buildings and landscapes. De Armas perceptively observes Cervantes' depiction of a metamorphosis in these structures and the mechanisms underlying such changes, wherein various architectural styles, ranging from classical to grotesque, are skillfully intermingled. Examples of de Armas' theoretical approach include his analysis of the Prologue of Don Quixote I, or the transformation of the Cave of Montesinos into a crystalline palace evocative of Nero's Domus Aurea, which exemplify noteworthy instances of superimposed architectures. Throughout his study, de Armas illuminates the correlation between architecture and other significant themes in Cervantes' oeuvre, namely captivity, imprisonment, the impact of environmental surroundings, and the repercussions of violence, warfare, or the plague. For example, de Armas delves into the architectural aspects related to Cervantes' imprisonments in Algiers and in Seville, as well as the spatial constraints arising from confinement during the plague. While these themes have received scrutiny from Cervantes scholars, their examination from an architectural vantage point represents a relatively novel and captivating perspective. The manuscript demonstrates de Armas' extensive knowledge of architecture and art, and their application within Renaissance culture. De Armas...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,693
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRevista de estudios hispánicosMême sujetHistorical Art and Architecture StudiesTravaux en français237 207