Investigation of the accuracy of a portable <sup>109</sup>Cd XRF system for the measurement of iron in skin
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract We have previously reported the design of a portable 109 Cd x-ray fluorescence (XRF) system to measure iron levels in the skin of patients with either iron overload disease, such as thalassemia, or iron deficiency disease, such as anemia. In phantom studies, the system was found to have a detection limit of 1.35 μ g Fe per g of tissue for a dose of 1.1 mSv. However, the system must provide accurate as well as precise measurements of iron levels in the skin in order to be suitable for human studies. The accuracy of the system has been explored using several methods. First, the iron concentrations of ten pigskin samples were assessed using both the portable XRF system and ICP-MS, and the results were compared. Overall, it was found that XRF and ICP-MS reported average values for iron in skin that were comparable to within uncertainties. The mean difference between the two methodologies was not significant, 2.5 ± 4.6 μ g Fe per g. On this basis, the system could be considered accurate. However, ICP-MS measurements reported a wider range of values than XRF, with two individual samples having ICP-MS results that were significantly elevated (p < 0.05) compared to XRF. Synchrotron μ XRF maps of iron levels in pigskin were acquired on the BioXAS beam line of the Canadian Light Source. The μ XRF maps indicated two important features in the distribution of iron in pigskin. First, there were small areas of high iron concentration in the pigskin samples, that were predominantly located in the dermis and hypodermis at depths greater than 0.5 mm. Monte Carlo modelling using the EGS 5 code determined that if these iron ‘hot spots’ were located towards the back of the skin at depths greater than 0.5 mm, they would not be observed by XRF, but would be measured by ICP-MS. These results support a hypothesis that iron levels in the two samples that reported significantly elevated ICP-MS results compared to XRF may have had small blood vessels at the back of the skin. Second, the synchrotron μ XRF maps also showed a narrow (approximately 100μm thick) layer of elevated iron at the surface of the skin. Monte Carlo models determined that, as expected, the XRF system was most sensitive to these skin layers. However, the simulations found that the XRF system, when calibrated against homogenous water-based phantoms, was found to accurately measure average iron levels in the skin of normal pigs despite the greater sensitivity to the surface layer. The Monte Carlo results further indicated that with highly elevated skin surface iron levels, the XRF system would not provide a good estimate of average skin iron levels. The XRF estimate could, with correction factors, provide a good estimate of the iron levels in the surface layers of skin. There is limited data on iron distribution in skin, especially under conditions of disease. If iron levels are elevated at the skin surface by diseases including thalassemia and hemochromatosis, this XRF device may prove to be an accurate clinical tool. However, further data are required on skin iron distributions in healthy and iron overload disease before this system can be verified to provide accurate measurements.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».