Housing booms in gateway cities By DavidLey, West Sussex: Wiley. 2023. 336pages. $41.95 (paperback). ISBN: 9781119853602
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In Housing booms in gateway cities, David Ley sets out “to examine the place of the homeownership market—its price trends, their causes and consequences, and its management by government—in the economy and the society of five gateway cities” (p. 13). Contributing to the discussions on wealth accumulation and housing in asset-based societies, the author builds his study on three precepts: (1) the increasing importance of housing as an investment asset and a popular wealth accumulation strategy, (2) the attractiveness of property markets in gateway cities for investors, and (3) the rise of unaffordable housing in these locales. With a particular focus on the post-2008 period, Ley investigates five gateway locations (Singapore, Hong Kong, Sydney, Vancouver, and London) to explain how the rise of housing prices in each context stems from the particular inter-relationships of local and global processes, notably, the priorities and strategies of elite growth coalitions and government responses to local realities and transnational pressures. Without providing a fully fledged comparison of the five cases, the author shows how the circumstances in each gateway city resonate with one another in that they face similar pressures, follow similar trends, and provoke similar government dilemmas. Each empirical chapter takes a deep dive into the housing market of one gateway city, highlighting the complex and evolving inter-connections between national sociodemographic and economic trends, global and geopolitical pressures, national political framings, and other significant local social realities. The chapter on Singapore shows that homeownership has long been framed as a form of asset-based welfare within the government's nation-building agenda, which has resulted in careful and sustained government interventions in the housing market over time (Singapore is presented as the outlier case). Moving to Hong Kong, Ley shows how the dynamics of the local housing market contribute to and are part of a growing class divide between owners and renters, mostly due to an unchecked elite growth coalition centred around global property developers. The study of Sydney adds to this mix the responsibility of governments in encouraging local and global investors to participate in the local housing market, often in a way that replaces an explicit housing policy with financial and tax measures. In Vancouver, Ley documents governments’ reluctance to acknowledge and resolve dysfunctional aspects of the local housing market, as well as recent efforts to reregulate the sector and address housing supply and affordability. Finally, in his study of London, and more specifically, the “season of excess” (p. 184) during the 2012 Olympics, the author highlights the key role of decades-old austerity policies and a neoliberal mindset restricting governments’ ability to deliver affordable housing and address rising inequalities. Whereas the empirical chapters provide valuable insights into the similar pressures and particular dynamics affecting the various locales, the introductory and concluding chapters ground the conceptual significance of studying affordability in the housing market to deepen our understanding of the contemporary dynamics of gateway cities. Ley puts forth highly relevant and carefully crafted observations about gateway cities, including housing market trends and pressures since the 1970s, and the role of global investment, especially from Asia, on price gains. The author also provides a much-needed discussion of the negative consequences of housing booms, including rising housing inequalities for key demographics such as youth, migrants, and peoples of colour, as well as their growing marginalization from asset-based wealth accumulation based on housing. This focus on the consequences of housing booms and policy responses does limit a broader, more complete look at everyday life in gateway locations amid these trends. Nonetheless, one of the most impactful arguments Ley makes throughout the book is how governments’ endorsement of asset-based welfare policies has shaped the timidity of their interventions to cool local housing markets and has resulted in many policy failures (with the exception of Singapore), leading to housing unaffordability and residential alienation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,139 | 0,056 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».