606 Artificial Intelligence-powered Mobile Tool for Burn Injury Evaluation for First Responders
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Accurate assessment and early interventions in the field are crucial to the prognosis of burn injuries. Studies have indicated that up to 35% of burn patients are inappropriately transferred to hospitals. In some pediatric burns, reports have suggested the total burn surface area (TBSA) has been overestimated as much as 44%. First responders play a pivotal role in the assessment and management of burn injuries, especially in remote areas. An intuitive mobile application that incorporates the standardized practices of Advanced Burn Life Support (ABLS) with integrated artificial intelligence (AI) to assist in burn size, depth, and management is needed. Methods The mobile application was designed with an experienced team of burn specialists, physicians, and software engineers to identify the gaps in first responder burn care and to standardize methods for initial burn assessment. Previously assessed burn photos were characterized based on their depth into split partial thickness, deep partial thickness, and full thickness burns. Laser doppler imaging taken at the time of clinical assessment confirmed the burn depth. These images were used to build a convolutional neural network from to predict burn depth and boundaries. Results An AI-integrated mobile application was developed encompassing a primary survey with management solutions with the fundamentals based on ABLS. The application ensures the collection of pertinent information for burns, such as the patient's weight for calculating fluid resuscitation and provides recommendations based on burn depth and surface area. Photos taken using the mobile device can be analyzed by the AI in real time to aid in burn assessment. The accuracy of the prototype AI model can in distinguish severity assessment with an F1 accuracy score of 78% with a receiver operating characteristic of 85%. Furthermore, the model has a 92% accuracy for determining the boundaries of the burn. Conclusions A smartphone burn application provides an integrated way to improve the efficiency and accuracy of first responders to assess, manage, and triage burns before reaching the hospital. Through the application, management recommendations are tailored to the extent of the injury and provides a detailed report to secondary healthcare providers. Applicability of Research to Practice A state-of-the-art burn application can be a tool that can be used by first responders to capture essential data while ensuring the accuracy of the initial assessment. The integration of artificial intelligence will help personalize and streamline the management pathway improving communication between field and hospital care providers and improving patient care.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle