591 Efficacy of a 3D Printed Microstomia Orthosis on Mouth Opening and Function, a Case Series
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Microstomia, often observed following facial burn injuries, can hinder functional activities such as eating, speaking, dental care, and medical procedures such as intubation. Thus, microstomia orthoses (MO) are used to increase mouth opening and function. Various designs of custom fabricated MOs have been published, however, to the best of our knowledge, the first report of a 3D MO for mouth burns was presented at the 2023 ABA conference. This 3D MO was modified to generate additional sizes and address issues of comfort and material rigidity. The modified 3D MO (available on Thingverse) was then trialed with 3 patients at different stages of their rehabilitation and their outcomes documented. Methods The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the efficacy of a 3D MO on mouth opening and function when used to treat 3 adult burn survivors. The mouth impairment and disability assessment (MIDA), including measures of horizontal and vertical mouth opening, was completed before the use of the 3D MO and after 4 months of wear. All participants had previously reached a plateau on the MIDA and opening measures after the use of various commercially available MOs before starting the 3D MO. They were also asked to evaluate the comfort and whether they would modify any aspect of the MO. Results The total material cost of this MO ranged from 2-3 $CAD. The print time ranged between 5.5-8 hrs (depending on mouthpiece size) using a 3D printer valued at ~250$CAD. The 3 participants were male with a mean age of 40 years, mean TBSA of 9.5% and 2/3 participants received face grafts. Patients started using the 3D MO at different timepoints post-burn: 4m, 9m and 15m. The 4-month post 3D MO wear MIDAs are currently being completed. However, one patient completed the questionnaire, which improved by15 points. Another patient was able to avoid having reconstructive surgery. To date, all patients improved both their horizontal and vertical mouth opening measures (mean improvement - horizontal: 0.72 (0.52) cm range [0.16-1.2]; vertical: 0.92 (0.41) cm range [0.67-1.4]). The MOs were worn between 2 weeks-4 months for a minimum of 30 min/day to achieve these results, but data collection is ongoing. All patients reported that the MO was comfortable, and they prefer it to all the MOs they had worn previously. Conclusions Although data collection is ongoing, patients who had previously plateaued have improved function and oral opening after the application of this modified 3D MO. Applicability of Research to Practice This cost-effective solution increases accessibility of MOs for individuals who do not have access to commercially available MOs. The need for economically feasible alternatives is particularly important in developing countries where burn injuries are more prevalent.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».