Doctrina Lectionis : Lessons from Lectio Divina for Benedictine Colleges
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Doctrina Lectionis: Lessons from Lectio Divina for Benedictine Colleges Thomas L. Humphries Jr. (bio) Thomas L. Humphries Thomas L. Humphries is a happily married dad and Professor of philosophy, theology, and religion at Saint Leo University, St. Leo, FL. He is a member of the Academy of Catholic Theology and the author of Ascetic Pneumatology (Oxford, 2013) and Who is Chosen? (Wipf & Stock, 2017). Footnotes 1. In my own learning to communicate with others the editors and reviewers at ABR have been most helpful. I wish also to thank my colleague, Daniel Lloyd, who has been a prayerful dialogue partner in both the theory and the practice expressed in this article. 2. In part this is a response to the Association of Benedictine Colleges and Universities' hallmark #2: "prayer" understood as "a life marked by liturgy, lectio, and mindfulness." See "Education within the Benedictine Wisdom Tradition," adopted by the ABCU in 2006 from the address of William J. Cahoy, available at https://www.abcu.info/abcu-education-within-the-benedictine-w. 3. Augustine, De Doctrina Christiania, 1.36.40, trans. R. P. H. Green, On Christian Teaching, Oxford World's Classics (Oxford, 1999), 27. 4. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lectio_Divina. Youtube.com lists several videos in a search for "lectio divina" that were created by individual theologians as well as major presses, many of which have total views measured in the tens of thousands. 5. Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Homiletic Directory (2015), 27–36; Francis, Evangelii Gaudium (2013), 152; Benedict XVI, Verbum Domini (2010), 35, 46, 82–87; USCCB, Fulfilled in Your Hearing (1982), 22–23, 36–39. The USCCB has published the series Lectio Divina of the Gospels for the Liturgical Year in both English and Spanish since 2020. 6. E.g. Mariano Magrassi's 1990 Bibbia e preghiera: La lectio divina was translated as Praying the Bible, an Introduction to Lectio Divina, trans. Edward Hagman, O.F.M. Cap. (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1998); Michael Casey, Sacred Reading, the Ancient Art of Lectio Divina (Ligouri, MO: Triumph Books, 1995); Basil Pennington, Lectio Divina: Renewing the Ancient Practice of Praying the Scriptures, (New York: Crossroads, 1998). For the more advanced reader, Duncan Robertson, Lectio Divina: The Medieval Experience of Reading, Cistercian Studies 238 (Collegeville, MN: Cistercian Publications, 2011), and Daniel Rees, et alia, Consider Your Call: A Theology of Monastic Life Today (London: SPCK, 1978) are exceptional. The classic study remains Jean Leclercq, L'Amour des lettres et le désire de Dieu, trans. C. Misrahi as The Love of Learning and the Desire for God (New York: Fordham University Press, 1974). Fr. Luke Dysinger continues to make available quality resources online: from the Manual for Oblates (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2009), http://ldysinger.stjohnsem.edu/@books/Dysinger/publs/2008_lectio_div_collegeville.pdf, and "Accepting the Embrace of God: The Ancient Art of Lectio Divina," https://saintandrewsabbey.com/homily/accepting-the-embrace-of-god-the-ancient-art-of-lectio-divina/. 7. E.g. Cindy Crosby, ed. Ancient Christian Devotional: A Year of Weekly Readings (Downer's Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press, 2007, 2009, 2011); Edith Barnecut, ed. Journey with the Fathers: Commentaries on the Sunday Gospels (New York: New City Press, 1992, 1993, 1994); and for the vetus ordo, D. G. Hubert, Sundays and Festivals with the Fathers of the Church (reprinted Waterloo, ON, Canada: Arouca Press, 2020). 8. Casey, Sacred Reading, 16. 9. Rees, Consider Your Call, 263–266, 269, and Georg Holzherr, O.S.B., The Rule of Benedict: An Invitation to the Christian Life, trans. Mark Thamert, O.S.B., Cistercian Studies Series 256 (Collegeville, MN: Cistercian Publications, 2016), 373–382 provide an excellent overview. In regard to the extent and nature of reading, Benedict is often contrasted with Cassiodorus, with Cassiodorus taken to present a period of study less obviously prayerful than Benedict encourages in the Rule (J. LeClercq, The Love of Learning, 19–22). 10. Benedict recommends reading Scripture, monastic literature from Cassian and Basil ("founders" of monasticism), and the Lives of the Fathers (RB 72). Denys Gorce, La lectio divina des origenes du cénobitisme à saint Benoît et Cassiodore (Wépion-sur-Meuse, Belgium: Monastère du...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,017 | 0,023 |
| Communication savante | 0,014 | 0,012 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,012 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,013 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».