MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4395041219 · doi:10.1002/mds.29818

Adult‐Onset Dystonia and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Patient with a De Novo 16q12.2q21 Deletion

2024· letter· en· W4395041219 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shaochen Qin, Yifeng Li, Y Li, Yiwen Wu

Notice bibliographique

RevueMovement Disorders · 2024
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueCongenital heart defects research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDystoniaHypertrophic cardiomyopathyMedicineInternal medicinePsychologyPediatricsPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Here, we report an unusual case of a 21-year-old male with adult-onset focal hand dystonia combined with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Whole-exome sequencing revealed a 3.08 Mb de novo deletion in the 16q12.2q21 region (chr16:55686758-58768147, GRCh37/hg19) encompassing the GNAO1 gene and a pathogenic heterozygous variation in MYBPC3, c.1000G>A (p.E334K) in exon 12. A 21-year-old male presented a history of abnormal posture in his left upper limb while walking and tremors in his right hand for almost 1 year. The patient was born by a full-term cesarean section and was denied the occurrence of ischemia or hypoxia during delivery. Focal hand dystonia in the left upper limb when walking (Video 1A) and action tremor can be clearly observed when drawing Archimedean spirals with his right hand (Video 1B). Physical examination revealed dysmorphic features including microcephaly (head circumference, 53 cm), small eye clefts, and upturned lips. Neurological examination revealed focal hand dystonia in the left upper limb and postural tremor in the right upper limb. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed no abnormalities (Fig. 1A,B). Cognitive assessments showed a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 21 (college-educated) and a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of 17. The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale score was 42.5/6 (motor/disability). Tremor analysis revealed tremors in the right upper limb with a frequency of 6 to 7 Hz and co-contraction of antagonistic muscles. Echocardiography revealed a ventricular septum thickness of 14 mm that led to the diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, the patient remained asymptomatic with little to no cardiac-related discomfort. On admission, the patient received symptomatic treatments including trihexyphenidyl (1 mg), levodopa (62.5 mg), and baclofen (10 mg) three times daily. Fortunately, dystonia symptoms and action tremor significantly improved after treatment. Patients with a 16q12.2q21 deletion are rare, with only two complete cases reported to date.1, 2 The deleted region in this patient differs from previous cases. As reported, dystonia may be related to GNAO1 haploinsufficiency.3 Up to date, point mutations and small indels in GNAO1 have been found in over 100 patients.4 Clinical manifestations typically appear in childhood. Interestingly, this adult patient exhibited mild non-motor symptoms without severe developmental delay and presented motor symptoms limited to focal dystonia and action tremor. Notably, previous reports on GNAO1 deletions indicated a limited occurrence of heart disease among such patients. Specifically, there were only three individuals with left ventricular hypertrophy5 and five with arrhythmia,6 and no documented cases of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Therefore, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in this patient is considered to be primarily because of a pathogenic variant in MYBPC3. Most notably, the possibility of GNAO1-related diseases should continue to be considered in patients with focal hand dystonia, even if their motor or non-motor symptoms are mild. A previous study demonstrated the favorable efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in such patients.2 It was appropriate to consider DBS if our patient subsequently developed generalized dystonia. This case prompts movement disorder specialists to consider the possibility of GNAO1-related diseases in patients with adult-onset focal dystonia, even if they do not have severe non-motor symptoms. We thank our patient and his family for their generous participation and permission to publish this case. Y.W. undertakes two projects funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, with project numbers 82371248 and 82171239. S.Q. undertakes the provincial and ministerial-level research project with the project number XGZX202117. Yifeng Li and Yanjing Li are currently not involved in any fund-supported projects. The funds mentioned above have no conflict of interest with this manuscript, and the objectivity of this submission has not been influenced by any external factors. (1) Research project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; (3) Manuscript: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique. Yiwen Wu was responsible for the overall project design, as well as supervision and guidance. Shaochen Qin and Yifeng Li were responsible for execution, data analysis, and writing. They contributed equally as first authors. Yanjing Li was responsible for proofreading, editing the manuscript, and submitting it for publication. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,219
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMovement DisordersMême sujetCongenital heart defects researchTravaux en français237 207