Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Open Windows: Teaching Mary Seacole Adam Guy (bio) I teach mary Seacole's autobiography of 1857, Wonderful Adventures of Mrs. Seacole in Many Lands, as part of a broad survey course titled Literature in English, 1830–1910. I teach this course to first-year undergraduate students in the first weeks of their English degrees at the University of Oxford. Since the majority of undergraduate education in Oxford takes place within its colleges rather than its faculties and departments, group sizes are small—roughly between three and twelve—and I usually teach between one and three of these groups each year. As a first-year teaching text, Wonderful Adventures is, among other things, a clear and engaging entry-point into talking about nineteenth-century literature and its entanglements with empire. As part of these discussions, Seacole's narration of her travels across the Americas to Britain enables me to introduce my students to the notion of the Black Atlantic. The text also provides an immediate challenge to students' notions of both what literature is and what autobiography is. Undergraduate readers coming to nineteenth-century literature tend to expect prose literature to be represented by the novel and to see autobiography as a simple transparent window on an individual's experience. Seacole's text helps us nuance both of these ideas, offering an engaging example of the fact that life writing was a distinct part of the nineteenth-century literary field and of the notion that autobiography can do more than simply relate a given personal truth. I begin my seminars on Seacole as she begins her text, with a discussion of her identity. As well as being the author of the widely selling Wonderful Adventures, Seacole—a free-born Jamaican woman—was a nurse, a hotelier, a businesswoman, and a traveller: she was born in Kingston in 1805 and died in London in 1881. All of these identities are in play as she narrates her personal history. The autobiography opens with Seacole's account of her "birth and patronage": "I was born in the town of Kingston, in the island of Jamaica, some time in the present century. As a female, and a widow, I may be well excused giving the precise date of this important event." She [End Page 33] goes on to add that she is "a Creole, and have good Scotch blood coursing in my veins" (11). As a teaching text, this opening works brilliantly as a general way of discussing the complex and multiple forms that identities can take; more specifically, it is as good an example as any of the identity discourses and categorizations available to writing subjects in the middle of the nineteenth century. I have long seen the latter notion to be a particularly important one to explore at the beginning of an English degree, a reminder for students that many aspects of identity and experience are historically circumscribed. Seacole's text can exemplify a nuanced form of historicism that breaks with students' preconceptions about the relationship between literature and history, a relationship too often taught at school level as a matter of finding one-to-one correspondences between literary materials and historical events. In this respect, Seacole's Wonderful Adventures becomes a paradigm for my students of how they might relate to and explore the literature of the past tout court. THE WONDERFUL ADVENTURES AS A PANDEMIC / EPIDEMIC TEXT At the onset of the 2020–21 academic year, in line with UK government policy, my institution returned to face-to-face teaching; the previous academic year had ended three-and-a-half months earlier amid a national COVID-19 lockdown during which all university business went online. The new academic year's return to the embodied world was both cautious and cavalier: cautious because of the heavy restrictions put on in-person interactions; cavalier because, with still so much to be learned about the virus and vaccines yet to be rolled out, student and staff lives were being put at risk. I taught two seminar groups that term. One seminar met in a dark-wallpapered nineteenth-century room from which the oak table had been removed. All participants sat on chairs spread out...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,037 | 0,017 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».