MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4395453654 · doi:10.1353/rfr.2023.a925819

The Jesuits: A History by Markus Friedrich (review)

2022· article· en· W4395453654 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Worcester

Notice bibliographique

RevueReview for religious · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistoryClassicsPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Jesuits: A History by Markus Friedrich Rev. Thomas Worcester SJ The Jesuits: A History. By Markus Friedrich. Translated from German by John Noël Dillon. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2022. Pp. xvi + 854. $39.95. In recent decades, the Society of Jesus (Jesuits) has been a hot topic among historians—church historians, cultural historians, intellectual historians, art historians, and many others—exploring the complexities of a religious order founded in the mid-1600s, suppressed by an Enlightenment-era pope, but then restored in the early 1800s by a pope eager for help in rebuilding the church in the wake of the French Revolution and Napoleon. The election of the first Jesuit pope in 2013 has no doubt helped stimulate interest in the history of the Jesuits, but the order was already eliciting an astonishing number of new studies, dissertations, books, and articles, in many languages. The work by Markus Friedrich reviewed here, is in its lengthy text and its abundant bibliography of primary and secondary sources, a very readable and helpful summary of what is at issue in Jesuit studies. In a prologue and five chapters, F. examines who the Jesuits were, what they did and why they did it, where they went all over the world, how they were committed to leaving behind worldly ideals and to obeying the pope regarding the missions to which they were sent, and how they rubbed elbows with secular and clerical elites as well as with the poorest of the poor. F. does a good job of showing how the Jesuits had many disciples, friends, supporters, and admirers, as well as rivals, opponents, enemies, and relentless critics eager to destroy the Society forever. In the prologue and five chapters, F. manages to both follow the chronological development of the Jesuits and focus on many of the most important themes or foci of Jesuit activity from founding by Ignatius of Loyola and a small group of companions, to growth in Europe and expansion to lands previously little known by Europeans. We see in detail how Jesuits became both the schoolmasters of much of Catholic Europe and missionaries to far flung-places, places where they learned the local languages and worked to preach the gospel while respecting diverse cultures. Jesuits were prolific writers, and their letters and narratives sent back to Rome and other European centers were often the best or even the only sources on certain parts of the world. But some readers of such accounts were not pleased with what they learned and condemned the Jesuits as soft on paganism. F. takes his lengthy, well-crafted [End Page 295] narrative up to the 1773 suppression and 1814 restoration of what Ignatius had begun. It is in a final section of some fifty pages entitled Epilogue: The Modern Society, that F. treats over two hundred years of the Jesuits, 1814 to the present. Though judicious in the choices made on what to cover, the epilogue, in its very title and in its necessarily rapid treatment of many significant topics, seems to say that the "modern" Jesuits matter less, in history, perhaps quite a lot less, than those "early modern" pioneers of the sixteenth to eighteenth centuries. Is this a fair judgment, or one based on too little attention to the abundant Jesuit sources for 1814 to the present? Is F. perhaps at times a bit too Eurocentric, and thus short-sighted on certain developments elsewhere? Much of the spectacular growth in the Society after the restoration occurred in the United States, Canada, Australia, India . . . a heavily Anglophone story, in fact. Though it is surely odd to suggest that a book well over 800 pages is too short (!), this one may need at least another 100 pages on post-1814. The book's many notes substantially enrich the volume's value, but they are placed at the end of the book instead of as bottom-of-page footnotes. A publisher's mistaken judgment, I would say. Some thirty-one illustrations considerably enhance the reader's access to the Jesuit past. But references to Jesuit "worship" of guardian angels (161) and "adoration" of the Virgin Mary (630) ring false as Jesuits...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,031
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,211 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReview for religiousMême sujetReformation and Early Modern ChristianityTravaux en français237 207