MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4395472296 · doi:10.2979/chiricu.7.2.16

Accountability across Borders: Migrant Rights in North America ed. by Xóchitl Bada and Shannon Gleeson (review)

2023· article· en· W4395472296 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ruth Murcia

Notice bibliographique

RevueChiricú Journal Latina/o Literatures Arts and Cultures · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAccountabilityPolitical scienceSociologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Accountability across Borders: Migrant Rights in North America ed. by Xóchitl Bada and Shannon Gleeson Ruth Murcia (bio) Xóchitl Bada and Shannon Gleeson, eds., Accountability across Borders: Migrant Rights in North America. University of Texas Press, 2019. Pp. 352. Accountability across Borders: Migrant Rights in North America, edited by Xóchitl Bada and Shannon Gleeson, offers an insightful collection of eleven qualitative case studies that examine the central role of migrant-led collectives in pressuring states' responsibility to promote and guarantee immigrants' rights in North America. At its core, the volume emphasizes migrant-led efforts in determining policy development and implementation of migrants' rights in origin and destination countries. The "multisited and multiscalar" approach employed in this book is a welcome contribution as it elevates the advocacy of migrant rights by questioning which and how countries and institutions are accountable for migrants at home, in transit, and abroad. The volume is structured around the concept of "migrant civil society," which, as Jonathan Fox and Gaspar Rivera-Salgado explain in chapter 1, consists of "immigrant-led membership organizations and public institutions" (25), including autonomous public spaces, migrant-led NGOs, and migrant-led media. This theoretical framework is important because it recognizes migrant-led collectives' civic, social, and political participation in the public conversation about immigration often overlooked by scholars, politicians, and mass media. As such, "migrant civil society" differentiates "migrant-led" from "pro-migrant" groups that are led by nonmigrants. Contributors suggest that the recognition of this bottom-up migrant movement equalizes representation amidst the public debate over immigration policy in the US and generates "more balanced coalition building" with potential allies in positions of power (27). They also maintain that migrant movements are strengthened by shared spatial and political contexts, identities, interests, and agendas, but warn readers that the sole attention to migrants' organizing capacity is not enough to understand the way dominant public institutions treat migrants. [End Page 179] The rest of the volume is divided into four parts, each focusing on migrants' rights initiatives in a particular geographical context—North America as a whole, Canada, Mexico, and the US. Part 1 discusses the multilateral mechanisms governing migrants within the three major nations of North America—Mexico, the US, and Canada. In chapter 2, José Ma. Serna de la Garza examines the multilateral regimes that dictate migrants' rights. He contrasts "soft laws" and "hard laws." Soft laws do not guarantee migrants' rights because they are nonbinding, but are the most preferred by governments because they facilitate states' entry into international regimes such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). "Hard laws," on the other hand, are binding and preferred by nongovernmental actors wishing to ensure the enforcement of migrant' rights. In chapter 3, Xóchitl Bada and Shannon Gleeson recount the efforts of a transnational coalition of organizations that, through petitions to the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC), pressured US and Mexican labor standards agencies to improve the conditions of temporary migrant workers. Part 2 focuses on Mexico's contradicting efforts to improve migrant rights. In chapter 4, Adriana Sletza Ortega Ramírez highlights the advances and limitations work of Oficinas Estatales de Atención a Migrantes (OFAMs, State Migrant Assistance Offices). OFAMs have advanced to adopt transnational migrants' rights advocacy by attending mostly their state's émigrés in the US and Canada. However, most OFAMs systematically disregard the crimes and violations against non-Mexican migrants en route through their territory. In chapter 5, Ana Lorena Delgadillo, Alma García, and Rodolfo Córdoba Alcaraz, based on their working experience with migrants, recount the excessive violence against Central American migrants in Mexico and highlight the transnational efforts by families of victims to gain government support. In Mexico, these efforts have resulted in the creation of the federal Forensic Commission, charged with searching for the remains of missing immigrants in Mexican territory. In chapter 6, Mónica Jacobo-Suárez examines the bureaucratic barriers US-born children face as they seek education, health care, and employment assistance in Mexico after being deported from the US along with their undocumented parents. Part 3, which focuses on Canada, examines the intrinsic flaws in existing...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,055

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,006
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,328
Écart entre enseignants0,319 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChiricú Journal Latina/o Literatures Arts and CulturesMême sujetMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationTravaux en français237 207