[The Place of Groin, Colson and McGregor Flaps in the Acute Care of Deep Burns to the Hand Dorsum : A Series of 6 Cases In Lille's Burn Centre].
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The acute management of deep burns to the dorsum of the hand and fingers represents a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. The exposure of osteo-tendinous structures often requires flap coverage, in a context where loco-regional or free flaps are not always feasible. The aims of reconstruction are to preserve a maximum of digital length, provide supple tissue, obtain protective sensitivity, and achieve a functional hand at 1 year. We report here on a series of 8 deep burns to the dorsum of the hand. Six hands were covered by Colson abdominal flap-graft and two by pedicled inguinal flap. Four out of 6 patients were reviewed in consultation, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 1 patient died. Clinical evaluation was performed by a surgeon other than the operator. Functional results are highly variable. Coverage time varies according to lesion depth and patient severity. Flap weaning took place at an average of 30 days. DASH scores ranged from 17.5 to 93/100, with average to poor total active motion (TAM) scores. The aesthetic result was satisfactory, with a Vancouver score of 4.5/13 on average, and an overall patient opinion of 3.75/10 on the POSAS scale. For deep burns to the dorsum of the hand and fingers, local flaps are rarely possible, and loco-regional flaps are not feasible in cases of associated upper limb damage. For medium to large surface areas, pedicled inguinal flaps and pocketing are two reliable techniques. Nevertheless, they require relative immobilization of the upper limb, which leads to stiffness. The question of digital pinning in the intrinsic or straight position remains unresolved, and does not appear to prevent secondary deformities. There is also a learning curve for these two flaps, even though they are reputed to be easy to lift. McGregor's flap or pocketing can be weighed against free flaps. However, the operating time is long, the surgical technique is complex, and vascular damage is common in the burn patient population. Although there have been enormous technical advances since their descriptions, the pedicled inguinal flap and pocketing remain alternatives to be considered in the acute management of deep burns to the dorsum of the hand. In this presentation, we propose a surgical management algorithm to situate these two techniques in the plastic surgeon's therapeutic armament.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».