Hydro-sedimentological drivers of fine sediment ingress in a gravel-bed river
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
• In-situ investigations of fine sediment ingress in gravel-bed rivers remain limited. • Ingress rates and directional mechanisms of accumulation were investigated across a range of flow conditions. • Three designs of sediment traps (>250 traps in total) were used. • Linear mixed effects models showed that the ingress of cohesive particles were well explained by mean hydro-sedimentological parameters. • Observed results have important implications on the legacy effects that can originate from ingressed particles. Most studies investigating fine sediment ingress in gravel-bed rivers have been conducted at the laboratory scale, and even fewer have explored the ingress processes of flocculated particles. Here, an extensive in-situ sampling programme was undertaken to investigate hydro-sedimentological drivers of interstitial fine sediment accumulation and to evaluate fine sediment ingress directional mechanisms in a gravel-bed river located on the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains in southern Alberta. Three sediment trap designs were installed across seven deployment cycles at four sites along the river. Instantaneous discharge, suspended solids concentration, and particle size distributions (of suspended and ingressed particles) were measured, while relevant hydraulic parameters were modelled with a flow model (MOBED). Distinct patterns of ingress dynamics between non-cohesive and cohesive fractions of fine sediment were observed. While the assessed hydro-sedimentological parameters did not statistically explain the ingress rates of non-cohesive 0.5 – 2 mm particles, the opposite was observed for < 0.5 mm particles, which were mostly transported in flocculated form. For flocculated sediment, horizontal ingress accounted for ∼ 60 % of interstitial accumulation. Directional ingress mechanisms, however, were dependent on flow conditions for both particle size fractions, with vertical and horizontal accumulations becoming more important during higher and lower energy flows, respectively. Our observations demonstrate the importance of ingress for the interstitial accumulation of fine sediment, even during events with flow above the critical threshold conditions for fine sediment gravitational deposition. Despite the comparable ingress rates to other studies, no interstitial clogging was observed in this study, demonstrating the channel potential storage capacity, which has implications for legacy impacts from landscape disturbances in the Crowsnest River catchment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».