THE HOPE OF THE GOSPEL: THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION AND THE NEXT EVANGELICALISM. By Mark S.Young. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2022. Pp. xiii + 137. Softcover, $16.30.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
WAYFAIRING THROUGH DESPAIR.By Ashley Moyse.New York: Anthem Press, 2022.Pp. x + 152.Hc $125.00.Moyse's critique of Western medicine begins with the story of his mother's stroke, entrance into hospice, and eventual death.He argues that medicine's focus is maintaining the strength and function of individual bodies in order to maintain their autonomy and independence.Hence, medicine sees bodies as a collection of reparable individual systems.Because pain also threatens autonomy, medicine comes to view it as foreign to the human condition, and something that should be eliminated by technological intervention.The medical focus on autonomy causes it to ignore the development of meaningful frameworks for living for individuals who become frail or dependent.This leads dependent individuals prone to despair, which contributes to efforts to legalize medical-aid-in-dying to promote "death with dignity".However, Moyse argues that if we can let go of our desire for control, we can finding meaning and hope by viewing life as an unfolding mystery in the company of others.Moyse underestimates the relational impact of persistent frailty.Even with diligent care and support, losing mobility, memory, and speech makes relating to others difficult.This failure is crucial since he claims that relationships prevent the despair, he finds so problematic.Medicine cannot cure loneliness, or frustrations arising from the inability to remember the names and faces of family members.He powerfully argues that the ill find dependence difficult, because we do not learn to be interdependent when well.We can only learn interdependence by learning to pay attention and attend to others in need.I should have engaged Moyse literature on how technology makes attending more difficult.In addition, Moyse gives an idealized portrait of caregiving, failing to acknowledge caregiving's physical and emotional demands.Care requires more than attention.One can recognize the needs of a frail other but lack the physical capacity to respond.This reality also causes despair.Even resolute caregivers who value the work they do suffer isolation, exhaustion, and sometimes physical injury because of their caregiving, something the book fails to acknowledge.Moyse asserts, without evidence, that society holds individuals responsible for their frailty.As a clinician, I see individuals whose choices contribute to their frailty, and real meaning can only be made when that reality is named, Moyse does not discuss pain's ability to destroy our capacity for relationships and meaning-making.Nor does he adequately defend his assertion that the desire to avoid pain means that we deny our interdependence and finitude.Patients use pain medications because they recognize their frailty and interdependence.Medicine cannot provide meaning or hope.However, medical specialties such as palliative care can use medical tools to help patients maintain relationships and be interdependent but not incapacitated, a reality Moyse does not explore.Moyse powerfully argues why medicine must expand its focus beyond
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».