Foamed Cement Mitigates Gas Migration in Shallow Thermal Wells in Alberta
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
_ This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 214768, “Mitigating Gas Migration Using Foamed Cement on Shallow Thermal Wells in Northeast Alberta,” by Charles Sylvestre, SPE, Sanjel Energy Services; Julio Oliveira, Suncor Energy; and Heyong Jiao, Sanjel Energy Services. The paper has not been peer reviewed. _ A foamed cement solution was designed and implemented to cement shallow intermediate casing strings in a heavy oil play in northeast Alberta after conventional area-specific cementing solutions could not prevent surface casing vent flows. Foamed cement was pursued as a better alternative technical solution and ultimately led to its successful placement in the field. Significant technical and operational hurdles were overcome to confirm proper well control and ensure that the energized cement could be pumped safely and effectively. Introduction MacKay River is Alberta’s shallowest steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) project, with wells typically ranging between 100 m and 150 m true vertical depth (TVD). Wells have been drilled recently at MacKay River with a horizontal length approaching 1000 m and total length exceeding 1500 m measured depth (MD). Wells at MacKay River are drilled using a slant rig because of the extremely shallow depth of the reservoir. The wells feature a three-string casing design with a shallow surface casing, an intermediate casing that runs from surface to the target formation and is landed at 90° inclination, and a horizontal production (or injection) liner hung off the intermediate casing. The intermediate casing is cemented in place and uses premium connections incorporating a metal-to-metal seal to provide a barrier between wellbore fluids and the formations overlying the reservoir. The complete paper discusses a new pad at the MacKay River SAGD operating site. The specific operations discussed are those involving intermediate cementing. Case-Well Challenges One of the most unusual features of the case wells was the discovery of gas trapped under a shallow formation at approximately 80–100 m vertical depth. The pad adjacent to this new pad has been in operation for 17 years. The second obstacle was the hole and casing size, which creates a large annulus. The open hole size was designed at 374.7 mm with the intermediate casing sized at 298.5 mm. This creates an annular gap of 38.1 mm in a gauge hole, but typically these wells require 150% cement excess to achieve cement returns to surface, meaning that, in certain areas of the well, the annulus is much larger. The next challenge presented by the case wells is that they are slanted wells, spudded at an angle of approximately 45° from the surface. The low temperature of these wells also adds to the complexity of preventing gas flow. At such low temperatures, cement sets much slower than in other well types. Finally, the shallow nature of the well, landing at only 113 m vertical depth, does not allow effective hydrostatic pressure control while the cement sets.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».