Roger Guillemin (1924 to 2024): Discoverer of brain hormones that control physiology
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Roger Guillemin, widely recognized as the father of Neu roendocrinology, passed away on February 21, 2024, in La Jolla, California.He had still been able to celebrate his 100th birthday a few weeks earlier in the joyous presence of his family, friends, and many ex-colleagues.His copious scientific contributions, which led to numerous prizes and awards, culminating in the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine in 1977, had opened the way, not only to a new understanding of the mechanisms that control the function of the anterior pituitary gland but also to the development of novel treatments for sex-steroiddependent cancers, endometriosis, precocious puberty, and pancreatic tumors.Born in Dijon (France) on January 11, 1924, Guillemin had developed a keen interest in biology and physiology early on, but at the time, the only way to study these fields was to go to medical school.He therefore obtained his medical degree in 1949 from the University of Lyon, but quickly found the practice of medicine too restrictive.While in Paris, Guillemin attended a seminar given by Hans Selye, the physician who had observed that regardless of their specific illness, hospitalized patients all displayed the same set of "nonspecific" symptoms.Guillemin became fasci nated by this concept of "stress" and followed Selye to the University of Montreal in Canada, where he obtained a PhD in experimental endocrinology in 1953.Corticosteroids had just been discovered as a major player in our body's response to stress, but for Guillemin, it was their antiinflammatory properties that turned out to be literally life saving.He had contracted tubercular meningitis at a time when few treatments were available, so Selye decided to try an untested experimental approach to save his stu dent's life: injection of these steroids into the spinal fluid.This worked so well, that having recovered, Guillemin was able to marry his nurse!A marriage that lasted 67 years and produced six children.While in Canada, Guillemin had encountered the British scientist Geoffrey Harris who promoted the then-revolutionary hypothesis that the anterior pituitary was regulated by "humoral" signals transported from the hypothalamus through blood vessels-one of the two portal systems of the human body.This went against the more generally accepted concept that this control was neuronal, and at that time, passionate battles raged between the two camps.However, experimental demonstration that hormonal compounds manufactured by the hypothalamus could reach the anterior pituitary through the portal vessel system as hypothesized by Harris, remained extraordinarily difficult.After leaving Selye's laboratory, Guillemin was recruited to Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, where he remained until 1970.Once at Baylor, Guillemin decided to join the "humoral" vs. "neural" battle and, in order to provide support for Harris's hypothesis, he tried another approach.In the mid-1950s, he designed a highly original experiment, that while simple in concept, represented a very difficult and novel strategy: He cocultured hypothalamic and pituitary cells and noticed that when the two types of tissues remained in close contact, hypo thalamic cells produced a substance which stimulated adren ocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) release by the pituitary cells.However, when the two cell populations were subsequently separated, ACTH release stopped.Guillemin concluded, cor rectly, that the hypothalamus produced signals that were humoral, and not neuronal, as they could act on pituitary cells
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».