Abstract PO5-07-01: A novel clinical risk score that can accurately predict the survival of young breast cancer patients: A UAE-based cohort study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) in women below the age of 40 accounts for approximately 7% of all BC cases. According to studies, BC in younger women is more likely to have negative tumor characteristics and outcomes compared to older women. The rate of early-onset breast cancer in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is higher than in the Western population (24%, previously reported). Young breast cancer patients in the UAE have worse adverse features, including a higher grade, a larger tumor size, and lymph node involvement, as we reported previously. Therefore, combining several clinical indicators to predict recurrence risk in our unique, heterogeneous young breast cancer group is needed. Aim:The aim of this study is to develop a statistical machine learning model that can predict survival and the risk of recurrence in a young breast cancer population seen and treated in a large-volume tertiary cancer center in the United Arab Emirates (Tawam Hospital). Methods: Early-onset breast cancer patients from a retrospective observational cohort study were included in this study (N = 904). A broad range of clinical data was collected. A multivariate ridge Cox regression model was performed using age, histology, molecular type (ER,PR,HER-2 status), T-stage, N-Stage, M-stage, grade, and BMI, and the interaction term age*BMI at the time of diagnosis. The primary outcome was time-to-death. A novel breast cancer risk score (BCRS) was developed as the linear predictor of the fitted-ridge Cox regression model. Breast cancer patients were categorized into low, medium, and high risk using the 33th and 66th centiles of the novel BCRS. A univariate Cox regression model was performed with a categorized BCRS as a predictor of time-to-death. Hazard ratios (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were plotted and compared using the log-rank test. Time-dependent sensitivity and specificity were computed at five- and ten-year follow-ups, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed in R version 4.2.3. Results: The median age was 36 years (IQR: 32–38), and 64% were Arabic. Fifteen percent had an event with a median duration of follow-up of 15.4 years (95% CI: 13.6–17.1). The estimated HR of the categorized novel BCRS in a univariate Cox regression model was 1.968 (95% CI: 1.075- 3.601) and 8.040 (95% CI: 4.695–13.769) for the intermediate and high-risk groups as compared to the low-risk group, respectively. KM curves show a clear separation in terms of survival between the three risk groups, p< 0.0001 (Figure 1). A cutoff value of -1.733 gives a sensitivity of 93.8 and 90.6 with corresponding specificities of 31.42 and 31.31 at five- and ten-year follow-up, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first study in the region that uses clinical data that combines several clinical characteristics and aims to design a statistical machine learning model to predict the risk of death from breast cancer. Our novel model can be used in daily clinical practice to identify high risk breast cancer patients and aid clinical decision-making in patients with breast cancer. However, further validation studies are needed. Figure 1:KM curves of breast-cancer survival for patients with low-risk (BCRS in [-2.32, -1.63], black curve), intermediate-risk (BCRS in [-1.64, -1.25], red curve), and high-risk BCRS in [-1.26, 1.41], green curve). Citation Format: Aydah Al-Awadhi, Mohammed Hourani, Mawada Hussein, Fatima Alkindi, Lina Wahba, Abla AlAgha, Alaa Shoqeir, Mouza AlShebli, Atlal Abusanad, Amar Ahmad. A novel clinical risk score that can accurately predict the survival of young breast cancer patients: A UAE-based cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-07-01.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».