Augment Nursing School and Workplace Experience by Promoting Psychological Safety, Compassion Satisfaction and Joy in Work
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Chapter Six presents an overview of how trauma-informed educational processes ensure that student nurses feel safe and supported in an ideal learning environment. Strategies that promote psychological safety are recommended followed by measures to foster compassion satisfaction and joy in work. Psychological safety consists of a civil and respectful place for learning to occur. Compassion satisfaction is derived from the gratification experienced by caregivers when caring for others, and joy in work consists of positive components in the work environment. Nursing students are a risk group for trauma, and they identify the following situations as sources of trauma, individual-related interpersonal experiences; those related to their role as students; trauma related to institutional and organizational exposure; and stressors associated with the community. The Four Core Assumptions of Trauma-informed Care are used as a guide to implementing psychological safety in nursing school and include specific measures for the classroom, simulation, and clinical settings. Those directly related to high-fidelity simulation include actions to make students feel safe before, during, and after each session. The positive feelings and six core assumptions associated with compassion satisfaction, and the role that self-compassion and worklife balance play are featured. Key aspects of the work environment that have the greatest impact on the well-being of nurses working in critical care consist of adequate staffing, meaningful recognition, and effective decision-making. Student nurses with a history of trauma can experience compassion satisfaction if they are able to identify with some of the positive aspects associated with being a trauma survivor. If new nurses are adequately supported by their employers they experience less stress, and increased fulfillment in their jobs. There are valuable justifications for creating joy in work. A focus on joy enhances the work experience, increases employee engagement, benefits the organization, and improves patient outcomes. Making the workplace happy is a shared responsibility, where everyone is expected to do their best work. Meaningful connection to other people is important where teamwork, cooperation, and a sense of camaraderie are ideal. Two specific forms of governance that promote joy in work are participatory and servant leadership. Psychological personal protective equipment (PPE) consists of individual and system-wide measures that support and safeguard the mental health of employees. Two Narrative Case Studies were presented. In the first one, a student nurse became re-traumatized when listening to a detailed story of someone’s traumatic experience. The second Narrative Case Study revealed how a new nurse considered leaving his high-acuity job because of a lack of appreciation. The following five learning activities were proposed, exploring assumptions about constructive feedback; ways to professionally express appreciation; understanding how you handle mistakes; creating a self-inventory to assess work-life balance; and incorporating the ten characteristics of servant leadership into practice. At the end of the Chapter, specific strategies were recommended to build college students’ self-confidence.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».