150 Development of a leaky gut model: Meta-analysis of plasma and fecal markers of leaky gut
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Intestinal integrity can be compromised in livestock and poultry species during stress events, including off-feed events. To develop a leaky gut model, weanling barrows 26 to 28 d old [n = 307; Duroc terminal line Fast genetics, initial body weight (BW) = 5.90 ± 0.47 kg), were used in a total of 6 randomized complete block experiments at the NutriQuest modeling center (Fergus Falls, MN). All trials included positive control (PC) and negative control (NC) treatments. The other treatments evaluated (n = 8) were various strains and levels of direct-fed microbial (DFM) products. With the exception of PC, all treatments had complete 24-h feed restriction (FR) approximately 18 d after arrival. Pigs assigned to PC had ad libitum access to feed. Pigs were housed 3 pigs per pen in 1 of 30 pens, and all pigs were fed a common high-quality basal diet. For 3 trials, pigs received Excede (Zoetis; Parsipanny, NJ) IM upon arrival and were provided gentamycin via water for 3 d post-arrival. For 3 trials, no prophylactic antibiotics were administered. Eighteen days post-arrival, fecal and plasma samples were collected from all pigs and feed was removed from FR pens. After 24 h, plasma and fecal samples were collected from all pigs, and one-half of the pigs per trial were harvested for tissue collection. Four days after FR, samples were collected similarly, and the remaining pigs were harvested. Plasma samples were analyzed for LPS binding protein concentrations (LBP), and fecal samples were analyzed for myeloperoxidase (MPO) concentrations. Data from the PC (n = 90) and NC (n = 92) treatments only were analyzed as Individual Participant Data meta-analysis using PROC MIXED of SAS. Data from all pigs (n = 307) were analyzed using PROC REG of SAS with forward step-wise selection to determine relationships between response variables. Plasma LBP concentrations did not differ between PC and NC 24 h after FR (P = 0.14). However, change in LBP concentrations and the ratio of LBP immediately before and after FR, differed between PC and NC (P < 0.001). For NC, LBP concentrations decreased, and for PC, LBP concentrations increased (Table 1). There was no effect of treatment on fecal MPO concentrations. Using the broader dataset (n = 307), variables that were predictive of plasma LBP concentrations immediately following FR were trial (P < 0.001), treatment (P < 0.001), and fecal MPO concentrations (P < 0.05). Variables that were predictive of change in LBP concentrations before and after FR were trial (P < 0.001), treatment (P < 0.001), and initial BW (P < 0.01). These data, taken with data presented in a companion abstract on ileal tight junction gene expression, suggest that plasma LBP concentrations immediately following a FR event are a useful marker of leaky gut. Fecal MPO concentrations do not consistently respond to FR.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,018 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,008 | 0,022 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».