PSIII-19 Impact of EnduraPig and EnduraSow supplementation on growth performance of wean to finish pigs naturally infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) continues to be an economically devastating disease to the pork industry around the world. Apart from vaccination and biosecurity measures, nutritional strategies are needed to mitigate the negative effects of PRRS virus (PRRSV) infection on pork production. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of EnduraPig and EnduraSow (PMI Additives) on growth performance, viremia, and livability of wean to finish pigs naturally infected with PRRSV. A total of 660 newly-weaned pigs [DNA L600 x 241 genetics; average body weight (BW) = 7.3 ± 0.14 kg) were divided into 33 pens (11 pens per treatment, 20 pigs per pen). Each pen within a location block was randomly assigned to one of three dietary treatments consisting of either a non-supplemented basal diet (NC), basal diet with EnduraPig (EP), or basal diet with EnduraSow (ES). Apart from growth [average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), feed to gain ratio (F:G)] and livability metrics, serum sample was also collected from 1 sentinel pig per pen at 0, 21, 42, and 63 d postweaning to monitor recovery from PRRSV infection, based on the change in percentage of viremic pigs. Analysis of variance for growth and mortality was performed using Mixed Procedure in SAS (SAS 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and a priori contrasts were used to detect treatment differences at P < 0.05. Association between treatments and % viremic pigs at each time point was assessed using Fisher’s exact test and declared significant at P < 0.05. Mortality and removals were greatest during the first 4 wk postweaning, but no treatment differences were detected in overall wean to finish mortality (23.6, 21.8, and 20.4% for NC, EP, and ES, respectively). At d 21, 89.9% of the pigs sampled were viremic compared with 56.8% on d 0. The average % viremic pigs went down to 57.5 and 18.5%, for d 42 and 63, respectively, with no treatment differences observed in both periods. Feeding EP, however, improved all growth performance metrics compared with NC (+11.8 kg in final body weight, P < 0.01; +13% in ADG, P < 0.01; +7% in ADFI, P < 0.05; and -5.5% in F:G, P < 0.05). Feeding ES also improved performance of wean to finish pigs over NC (+16.4 kg in final body weight, P < 0.01; +18% in ADG, P < 0.01; +12% in ADFI, P < 0.01; and -5.2% in F:G, P < 0.05). In summary, the results of this study indicate that dietary supplementation of EnduraPig or EnduraSow improved growth performance of wean to finish pigs naturally infected with PRRSV, indicating that these nutritional technologies help boost the immune response against PRRSV.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».