MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4396772926 · doi:10.2175/193864718825159353

Designing a Pump Station Replacement within Tsunami and Sea Level Influenced Zone

2024· article· en· W4396772926 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erik Waligorski, Tyler Whitehouse

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of the Water Environment Federation · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueEarthquake and Tsunami Effects
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeologyComputer scienceMarine engineeringGeodesyEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Designing a Pump Station Replacement within Tsunami and Sea Level Influenced ZoneAbstractPurpose: The purpose of this presentation is to provide the attendees with planning and design criteria and solutions when dealing with the design of a sewer lift station within a tsunami and sea level rise impact zone. Background: The City of Bellingham is located approximately 100 miles north of the City of Seattle in Washington State, 20 miles from the Canadian border. The city's Roeder Lift Station is located near the industrial area along Bellingham Bay and serves much of the northern part of the city. The existing lift station was suspected to be operating under reduced reliability conditions during peak storm events. The city contracted with Carollo Engineers to complete an alternatives analysis and design to increase the existing lift station's pumping capacity from approximately 8 million gallons per day (mgd) to 18 mgd. The existing dry-pit/wet-pit station is located on a small city-owned parcel of land surrounded by Port of Bellingham (Port) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad properties. The station's existing 18-inch diameter force main is routed through a city utility easement on Port and BNSF properties including crossing under a BNSF spur track to reach the discharge manhole location. Two lift station retrofit alternatives and one new submersible lift station alternative were evaluated, including installation of a parallel force main alternative. The selected alternative included a new submersible lift station 1,100 feet north of its current location. The lift station design included a combination of variable speed driven non-clog submersible pumps and screw centrifugal pumps in self-cleaning pre-rotation basins with a pumping range of 1 to 18 mgd. Other improvements included 2,500 lineal feet of parallel 14-inch and 28-inch diameter HDPE force mains with trenchless installation beneath the railroad, installation of a 36-inch diameter PVC gravity sewer main and manholes, and miscellaneous 24-inch diameter HDPE water main replacement. Design Challenges: During the planning and design of the sewer lift station replacement, several design challenges came to light. These included the limited property owned by the city and the lack of a viable location near the existing station, the presence of a creek just west of the proposed station location, and issues related to the stations location near Bellingham Bay including tsunami and seal level rise impacts. The first challenge encountered by the design team was the lack of city-owned property near the existing station. Two of the replacement alternatives included retrofitting the existing station infrastructure while a third alternative included constructing a new adjacent station. The lack of property available to the city required relocating the proposed lift station. Further validating the need to relocate the station was the presence of Squalicum Creek approximately 2,000 feet upstream of the proposed station location. The existing gravity sewer crosses the creek before entering the station and the top of the pipe is exposed in the creek bed. The city has future plans to improve the creek which would require lowering the sewer line. An analysis was completed to look at installation of a deeper gravity sewer or installation of an inverted siphon. The two challenges having the greatest impact on the design of the new sewer lift station were sea level rise and tsunami impacts. Based on FEMA mapping, the location of the new lift station is within the 100-year flood plain. The potential impact of flooding became painfully apparent during November 2021 when a major rain event caused significant flooding at the proposed lift station site. Adding to the challenge, the FEMA flood maps do not take into consideration future long-term change due to climate change and the rising sea level. Sea level rise predictions for our project area ranged from 1.1 to 11.7 feet above the base flood elevation. Through multiple modeling efforts the design team settled on a sea level rise impact of 1.5 meters and a 100-year storm event to set the initial water surface elevation used for design. The final challenge impacting the design of the replacement lift station was the fact that the new site was located within the Tsunami Design Zone. With the State's adoption of the International Building Code, we were required to use the Washington Tsunami Design Zone Map to determine whether Risk Category III or IV structures needed to be designed for tsunamis. The tsunami inundation elevation at the project site was identified as 21 feet based on mapping. Ultimately, the impacts related to tsunami inundation controlled the site design and the new station was elevated 9 feet above the existing grade. Status and Conclusions The project was bid for construction in April of 2023 with an engineer's estimate of $18 million including tax. The city received four bids ranging from a low bid of $17.5 million to $21 million. The project is currently under construction with an estimated completion date of Spring 2026. The design of the replacement sewer lift station was impacted by multiple surrounding water bodies which lead to many lessons learned throughout the design. Scour within Squalicum Creek caused exposure of the existing gravity sewer line. Future improvements to the creek impacted the depth of the future sewer upgrade requiring a deeper lift station wet well. This factor required construction of a new lift station and would not allow retrofit of the existing station. The location of the new lift station site and its proximity to Bellingham Bay caused the need to design for sea level and tsunami impact zones. Lessons that were learned during the design included understanding that FEMA flood plain mapping does not take sea level rise into account and that tsunami inundation can have a more significant impact on the final grade of the proposed site. Additionally, the design of the on-site structures themselves relative to the thickness and strength of the structure walls can be affected by the potential for tsunami impact loads. Finally, construction in a historically intertidal zone overlaid by fill required ground improvement design to stabilize the soils before construction could begin.This paper was presented at the WEF Collection Systems and Stormwater Conference, April 9-12, 2024.SpeakerWaligorski, ErikPresentation time16:15:0016:45:00Session time15:45:0016:45:00SessionTidal and Sea Level Rise ImpactSession number11Session locationConnecticut Convention Center, Hartford, ConnecticutTopicClimate Change Adaptation, Design Storm, Lift Station, Modeling, Resiliency, Sea Level Rise, Stormwater Case Study/Application, Stormwater Management Design And Analysis, Tsunami, Wet WeatherTopicClimate Change Adaptation, Design Storm, Lift Station, Modeling, Resiliency, Sea Level Rise, Stormwater Case Study/Application, Stormwater Management Design And Analysis, Tsunami, Wet WeatherAuthor(s)Waligorski, ErikAuthor(s)E. Waligorski1, T. Whitehouse1Author affiliation(s)Carollo Engineers 1SourceProceedings of the Water Environment FederationDocument typeConference PaperPublisherWater Environment FederationPrint publication date Apr 2024DOI10.2175/193864718825159353Volume / Issue Content sourceCollection Systems and Stormwater ConferenceCopyright2024Word count13

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,079
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,300

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,187
Écart entre enseignants0,178 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of the Water Environment FederationMême sujetEarthquake and Tsunami EffectsTravaux en français237 207