MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4396781950 · doi:10.1353/tech.2024.a926354

Hacking Diversity: The Politics of Inclusion in Open Technology Cultures by Christina Dunbar-Hester (review)

2024· article· en· W4396781950 sur OpenAlex
Maria B. Garda

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTechnology and Culture · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCultural Industries and Urban Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHackerDiversity (politics)Inclusion (mineral)PoliticsSociologyMedia studiesAnthropologyGender studiesPolitical scienceComputer scienceLawComputer security

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Hacking Diversity: The Politics of Inclusion in Open Technology Cultures by Christina Dunbar-Hester Maria B. Garda (bio) Hacking Diversity: The Politics of Inclusion in Open Technology Cultures By Christina Dunbar-Hester. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020. Pp. 280. The open technology movement brought us the Linux operating system and the Firefox web browser. Its historical roots reach deep into the hacker and hobbyist cultures of the twentieth century. Hence, perhaps not surprisingly, open technology communities are facing the same problem as many other DIY cultures: lack of diversity. Since the 2000s, these issues have been challenged by a growing number of activists and social change advocates. Their volunteer work within open technology groups is the topic of Hacking Diversity, written by the leading scholar on democratic [End Page 740] control, Christina Dunbar-Hester. In her book, she poses a simple yet increasingly relevant question: "What happens when ordinary people try to define and tackle a large social problem?" (p. 3). In sociology, diversity reflects on the levels of inclusion of historically underrepresented groups in a social environment (e.g., workplace). Dunbar-Hester embraces diversity as an emic concept, "emanating from within the communities that form the subject of this study" (p. 17). There are arguably as many definitions of diversity as there are policymakers, but this kind of ethnographic approach allows the author to focus on the everyday practices of her respondents. Influenced by works of Gabriella Coleman (Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy, 2015) and Sarah Davies (Hackerspaces, 2017), this book is a result of many years of extensive fieldwork and historical contextualization. Each of the six main chapters of Hacking Diversity introduces the reader to various examples of hacking, making, and crafting practices and communities. I especially applaud the attention paid to hobbyists from underrepresented demographic groups and borderline interventions, such as the experimental cryptodance event in Montreal that "conjoined arts practice with pedagogy about the principles of cryptography in computing" (p. 96). Dunbar-Hester directs much attention toward questions of social justice, and her observations are always framed with care and sensitivity toward the cultural complexity of the problem. The book is at its best when it critically investigates the relations of power in the open technology communities, be it online or in Brooklyn. To paraphrase the author, there is some deep irony in the fact that the previously discriminated social groups of geeks and nerds are now reproducing the dynamics of injustice within their own circles (p. 67). This kind of study will be of great value to future North American–oriented research, as it documents the diversity work within the hackerspaces at the time of the #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter movements. Hacking Diversity exposes the internal struggles of a community that, on the one hand, has a lot of utopian faith in technological solutions being able to make the world a better place and, on the other, is slowly beginning to recognize that there is no simple hack that could solve the systemic problems society is facing. As Dunbar-Hester observes, just because the problem persists within technology culture doesn't mean it can be solved with a technological fix (p. 241). Furthermore, she makes a fine point that the diversity advocates in tech are often engaging with neoliberal and corporate-friendly notions of inclusion that are limited to representation politics and do not address the underlying issues of global equity (ch. 5). After all, if we investigate who works in the technology sector on a global scale, who actually makes the devices we all use, then "women workers of color actually abound" (p. 20). Overall, Hacking Diversity helps readers better understand the issues of diversity in the North American tech industry. It will prove to be a very useful resource for historians of technology, as it documents many ephemeral [End Page 741] events and communities. I hope the book will encourage more studies on local hacker culture, especially outside of the United States (such as Gerard Alberts and Ruth Oldenziel, eds., Hacking Europe, 2014), as well as on politics of inclusion in other areas of technology. Maria B. Garda Maria B. Garda is a postdoctoral researcher at the Centre of Excellence in Game Culture...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,821
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,924

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,316
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle