MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4396802248 · doi:10.1353/phx.2023.a926385

Between Deity and Dedicator: The Life and Agency of Greek Votive Terracotta Figurines by Sanne Hoffmann (review)

2023· article· en· W4396802248 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sarah G. Murray

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhoenix · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueClassical Antiquity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTerracottaAgency (philosophy)ArtAncient historyHistoryPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Between Deity and Dedicator: The Life and Agency of Greek Votive Terracotta Figurines by Sanne Hoffmann Sarah Murray Between Deity and Dedicator: The Life and Agency of Greek Votive Terracotta Figurines. By Sanne Hoffmann. Berlin: De Gruyter (Image and Context 23). 2023. Pp. xi, 347. Research on ancient Greek and Roman art has not always been evenly applied across categories of material or artifact. Ancient products judged to be of superior aesthetic quality or characterized by an impressive monumental scale occupied an outsized proportion of art historical attention during most of the twentieth century and remain staunchly entrenched in both popular perceptions of the Greco-Roman world and textbook accounts of ancient art. They nonetheless represent a tiny fraction of the rich material cultural output of Greek and Roman artists and craftspeople, which included a vast array of smaller and less immediately prepossessing objects that were long relegated to storage basements and summary catalogs in excavation reports. This book, a revised version of the author's 2019 PhD thesis, joins a growing body of research turning scholars' attention to these previously neglected categories of artifacts, in this case, Greek votive terracotta figurines. Terracotta figurines in a wide variety of shapes and sizes are commonly found in historical Greek ritual contexts. While many are characterized by "mass production" and therefore not considered to be amongst the most beautiful artifacts recovered from Greek ritual contexts, they constitute a quantitatively formidable and spatially widespread source of information for interrogating material characteristics of Greek ritual practice. The book under review endeavors to extract such information through the systematic analysis of relevant assemblages and contexts, structured through the theoretical lens of the chaîne opératoire (the "operational sequence"). This approach to understanding material objects was first articulated by the anthropologist André Leroi-Gourhan in the 1960s1 and widely adopted in archaeological case studies throughout the later twentieth century, before more recently trickling into the realm of classical archaeology. Most [End Page 190] studies adopting a chaîne opératoire framework focus on the individual choices and cultural traditions that concern craft production. However, Hoffmann follows a few recent studies in expanding the framework to encompass "the entire life history or life cycle" of figurines, from manufacture through use to disposal (26–27). The book's structure straightforwardly reflects this scope. An introductory chapter reviews basic characteristics of research on Greek terracotta votive figurines and justifies the choice of analytical method. Four substantial chapters discuss evidence for the figurines' production, circulation, dedication, and deposition, as well as the ultimate decline in their use in votive practices. A brief final chapter reviews conclusions resulting from the study. The book is handsomely produced and richly illustrated, with well-placed (often color) photographs that reinforce the author's observations and archaeological plans that are helpful in making clear the figurines' depositional context. The author's comprehensive approach serves to bring out numerous heretofore unappreciated characteristics of the material at the heart of analysis. Chapter Two's discussion of production and circulation emphasizes that terracotta votive figurines were transported across long distances in large numbers. As the author observes, such a distributional pattern is suggestive of a sophisticated logistical system encompassing both manufacturing and circulation, the nature of which has not been dealt with in research on Greek or Mediterranean exchange economies (66–68). It is intriguing that these terracotta figurines were in such demand that they merited the development of a complex and far-reaching system. Hoffmann suggests that the uniformity of the figurines was particularly appealing insofar as it supported diasporic efforts to embrace "Greekness," an idea that one could imagine being developed more thoroughly in future publications. A related and equally compelling observation is that the types identified by Hoffmann appear to be reasonably generic in that they are not restricted to certain periods, regions, or target deities (145). This might indicate that the dedication of votive figurines was more closely linked to spatial variation in the practice of votive-centered rituals rather than to the tailoring of ritual action to the stereotypical attributes or concerns of Olympian...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,023

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,332
Écart entre enseignants0,289 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhoenix→Même sujetClassical Antiquity Studies→Travaux en français237 207→