MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4396802572 · doi:10.1353/phx.2023.a926378

Maximianus' "Elegies": Love Elegy Grew Old by Vasileios Pappas (review)

2023· article· en· W4396802572 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Grace Funsten

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhoenix · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueByzantine Studies and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésElegyArtLiteraturePoetry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Maximianus' "Elegies": Love Elegy Grew Old by Vasileios Pappas Grace Funsten Maximianus' "Elegies": Love Elegy Grew Old. By Vasileios Pappas. Berlin: De Gruyter. 2023. Pp. 246. Maximianus' Elegies, composed in Latin in the sixth century c.e., offer a strange reflection of Augustan love elegy, in which an elderly lover-poet looks back on a lifetime of unsuccessful romantic encounters. In keeping with the current uptick in scholarly attention to late antique poetry, Vasileios Pappas's monograph on the Elegies builds on fresh interest in Maximianus, exemplified by the recent commentaries of A. M. Juster and Emanuele Riccardo D'Amanti.1 Notably, Pappas's monograph is the first to collect and synthesize the past fifty years of scholarship on Maximianus, making its bibliography a valuable resource for scholars. Pappas takes an almost entirely literary approach to the Elegies, focusing on generic interplay and metapoetic statements in the work, as well as Maximianus' intratextual tendencies. His main argument is that Maximianus is a self-conscious poet whose aim in the Elegies is to comment on the decrepit state of the genre in his time and renew it by infusing his poetry with features from other genres. This is not a new argument. James Uden and Ian Fielding2 as well as Paul White3 have discussed the poetic and political aspects of Maximianus' fixation on old age. Wolfgang Christian Schneider4 has [End Page 183] highlighted the mix of genres in the Elegies as a stylistic choice characteristic of Late Antiquity. However, Pappas does elaborate these ideas more fully than previous scholars and adds some interesting observations. The monograph is divided into eight chapters: an introduction, a conclusion, and one chapter per "poem." In the introduction, Pappas mentions the current debate surrounding the division of the Elegies, which may have been composed as one continuous poem and then split into six during the early modern period, but he chooses not to offer an opinion on it. For clarity, I will use the same divisions throughout this review. The rest of the introduction offers an overview of the little that is known of the historical Maximianus, common motifs in his poetry, the Appendix Maximiani, and Pomponius Gauricus's early modern repackaging of Maximianus' Elegies as the work of Cornelius Gallus. Pappas's research on Gauricus is careful and a welcome addition to Paul White's 2019 book on the subject.5 Each of the six chapters on individual elegies is structured in the same way, with small variations. After a summary of the poem in question, Pappas offers general comments, often by summarizing previous scholarship. These comments include a political reading of the speaker's old age in Elegy 1, an overview of Boethius' role in Elegy 3, and an interpretation of the speaker's impotence in Elegy 5 as a response to Christian asceticism. Pappas also notes lexical connections between the Elegies, which make up the bulk of his approach to intratextuality, before he turns to questions of genre, analyzing both the "host" and "guest" genres of each poem. Chapters Two to Seven all include sections on elegy as the host genre, in which Pappas enumerates words and themes that mark the poems as elegiac. These sections quickly become repetitious and would perhaps have been more effective if they had been combined and placed in the introduction. Pappas's sections on guest genres outline references to epic, comedy, tragedy, philosophy, legal texts, and medical texts in the poems. In most cases, Pappas treats generic mixture as an end in and of itself, without considering how each guest genre serves Maximianus' poetic program. However, his approach yields interesting results in his chapter on Elegy 3, in which he argues that Boethius' success in bribing Aquilina's parents turns the citizen girl into a comic meretrix, her mother into a lena, and himself into a servus callidus plotting to help the amator get the girl. The final section of each chapter offers a metapoetic reading of the poem at hand. These sections cover Pappas's most original argument, which is that all of the women in the Elegies (Lycoris in Elegy...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,028

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,228
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhoenixMême sujetByzantine Studies and HistoryTravaux en français237 207