MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4396805991 · doi:10.1111/all.16157

Comparison of upper and lower airway expression of SARS‐CoV‐2 receptors in allergic asthma

2024· letter· en· W4396805991 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Maral Ranjbar, Christiane E. Whetstone, Ruth P. Cusack, Dhuha Al‐Sajee, Hafsa Omer, Nadia Alsaji, Terence Ho, MyLinh Duong, Patrick Mitchell, Imran Satia, Paul K. Keith, Yanqing Xie, Jonathan MacLean, Doron D. Sommer, Paul M. O’Byrne, Roma Sehmi, Gail M. Gauvreau

Notice bibliographique

RevueAllergy · 2024
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAsthma and respiratory diseases
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University Medical CentrePopulation Health Research InstituteMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesAstraZeneca Canada
Mots-clésAsthmaAirwayMedicineSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Allergic asthmaReceptorImmunology2019-20 coronavirus outbreakCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)VirologyInternal medicineAnesthesia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) which is responsible for Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), infects host cells through the cell surface receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in conjunction with the cell surface transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2). In asthmatic patients, mRNA expression of these receptors are shown to be down regulated in upper airways compared to the lower airways.1 Additionally, it is evident that type 2 asthma (T2) inflammation influences the expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2.2, 3 In the present study, we examined the levels of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in upper and lower airways and investigated the relationship to T2 inflammation through measures of alarmin cytokines IL-33 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). Bronchial tissue from allergic asthmatics (AA) and healthy controls (HC), and nasal tissue from AA with additional co-morbid allergic rhinitis (AR), and HC (Table S1) was immuno-stained and analyzed by immunofluorescent microscopy for protein expression of ACE2, TMPRSS2, IL-33 and TSLP. Written consent was obtained from all the participants of this study. We found significantly more cells immuno-positive for ACE2 in the bronchial tissue of AA versus bronchial tissue of HC (p <.0001), and versus nasal tissue of AR (p =.007) (Figure 1A). There were significantly more TMPRSS2 immuno-positive cells in nasal tissue of AR compared to HC (p =.002), while co-expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 was more frequent in AA versus HC in bronchial tissue (p =.02), but not significantly so in nasal tissue (p =.09) (Figure 1A). IL-33 displayed the same pattern as ACE2, with highest levels measured in the bronchial tissue of AA (Figure 1B). There was a significantly higher number of TSLP immuno-positive cells in bronchial versus nasal tissue, and this was a consistent finding in both the allergic (p =.02) and the HC (p =.002) (Figure 1B). This higher expression of the SARS-CoV-2 receptors as well as alarmin cytokines in allergic tissue, particularly in the bronchial tissue compared to the nasal tissue, is consistent with previous literature demonstrating primary expression of these receptors in bronchial cells, and that ongoing exposure inhaled allergens upregulates alarmin cytokines in asthmatic individuals.3 A similar pattern in the expression of alarmins and SARS-CoV-2 receptors in allergic tissue led us to investigate whether there were any relationships. When including all tissue and donors we observed a weak positive correlation between ACE2 levels and IL-33 and (r = 0.35, p =.01) but not with TSLP. However, in the smaller datasets examining upper and lower airway tissue separately we did not find any significant correlations between the expression of alarmins and ACE2/TMPRSS2 (data not shown); additional experiments are required to explore this observation. Our study is the first to report higher protein levels of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptors in in allergic tissue, and these findings are consistent with measurements of RNA in previous studies,1, 4 together suggesting that individuals with allergic airways disease may have a higher number of viral entry receptors in airways compared to HC. Despite these findings, recent data have shown that asthmatic patients have a lower risk of COVID-19 infection.5 These findings could be affected by a variety of factors in asthmatic patients including increased mucus production and susceptibility and exposure of S1/S2 cleavage site to proteases, but other factors such as age, sex, genetic predisposition, expression of non-functional isoform of the ACE2 receptor, and different SARS-CoV-2 variants could also play a role.6 Our staining antibodies are unable to distinguish between the long and short isoforms of the ACE2 receptor, and additional research is required to explore whether asthmatic patients possess a higher prevalence of the short isoform. Overall, further research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms underlying the lower risk of COVID-19 in asthmatic patients, which may have important implications for the management of COVID-19 in individuals with allergic airway disease. All authors contributed to the study design, acquisition or analysis of data, were involved with drafting of this manuscript, and approved the final version and are accountable for all aspects of the work. We would like to acknowledge funding from AstraZeneca Canada (ESR 20-20723) and Mitacs (IT22844). The authors have no conflict of interest related to this manuscript. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. Data S1. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,041
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,308
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAllergyMême sujetAsthma and respiratory diseasesTravaux en français237 207