Mahbereseb: Traditional Community-Based Mechanisms and Responses that Support and Facilitate the Health and Well-Being of Ethiopian Immigrants in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Approximately 20 percent of Canada's population are immigrants. Along with Eritrea, Uganda, Ghana, and Nigeria, Ethiopia has become one of the primary countries sending immigrants to Canada. As a result, a growing Ethiopian immigrant community is beginning to form a significant diaspora within the Canadian population. Immigrant economic integration has become a key government priority; however, the processes of immigration and settlement are inherently stressful, and therefore integration necessitates that the psychosocial well-being of immigrants be considered. As one of the largest groups of African immigrants to Canada, Ethiopians address well-being for the most part by opting to utilize and contribute to communal mechanisms in their diasporic community that support health and well-being. For Ethiopians, health is derived both from a state of equilibrium within the body and a balance between the individual and the external world. Communal mechanisms are integral in settlement and integration because, being aligned with Ethiopians’ traditional social roots, they attend to their mental, physical, spiritual, and emotional well-being, which are disrupted as a result of migration. This chapter will explore the ways in which a series of communal mechanisms— the forming of a diasporic community, the establishment of religious institutions within that community, Mehaber (a collection of individuals with a common interest or identity that meet regularly) and Iddir (informal insurance)—exist as systems of support that offset the mental health risk factors associated with migration and integration. This exploration focuses on how these practices are shaped by the ways in which their well-being is threaded between their homeland and the host country through their interactions with transnational social fields. This chapter will discuss how these multidimensional (social to economic) communal mechanisms organize well-being, and how well-being is symbiotically organized by community. This chapter has important implications for: (a) how well-being is conceptualized, understood, and practiced cross-culturally in settlement and integration work; (b) the way well-being, as lived through community practices, structures responses that support further well-being; and (c) how cultural mental health interventions can be advanced through community mental health approaches that conceptualize community as transnational. Last, readers should note that there is not a one-dimensional story of the Ethiopian immigration experience. This work acknowledges the complicated, nuanced, and diverse experiences that make up the Ethiopian immigrant story and, as such, this chapter presents one aspect of a vital part of diaspora life seldom researched.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».