MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4396951676 · doi:10.1002/pbc.31058

BRAF/MEK inhibitors use to treat ventriculoperitoneal shunt‐associated ascites in pediatric low‐grade gliomas

2024· letter· en· W4396951676 sur OpenAlexaff
Nisreen Amayiri, Mouness Obeidat, Dima Abu Laban, Awni Musharbash, Maysa Al‐Hussaini, Bayan Maraqa, AhmadKh. Ibrahimi, Nasim Sarhan, Éric Bouffet

Notice bibliographique

RevuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2024
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAscitesShunt (medical)Blood cancerInternal medicineOncologyRadiologyCancer

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor: Low-grade gliomas (LGGs), the commonest brain tumors in children, are characteristically driven by alterations in the RAS/MAPK pathway.1 This pathway can be targeted with BRAF/MEK inhibitors and achieve better progression-free survival than chemotherapy.2, 3 When hydrocephalus complicates LGGs, a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) may be needed. VPSs may be complicated by infections, malfunction,4 ascites,5 and metastatic spread.6 The mechanism underlying VPS-associated noninfectious nonmalignant ascites is not well understood. However, the high cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein content and the inability of the peritoneal lymphatic drainage to effectively absorb the fluid seem to be the most accepted theory.7, 8 When ascites develop, shunt diversion is usually needed and the alternatives would be ventriculo-atrial (VA),5 or ventricular-gallbladder,9 or ventriculo-pleural shunts. VA shunts have several complications (e.g., endocarditis, pulmonary hypertension, right-side heart failure),10 in addition to its challenging technical insertion in young children. There are several case reports of noninfectious nonmalignant shunt ascites in children with LGGs5, 8, 9; most needed shunt diversion. Here, we present two patients with desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma (DIA)/desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma (DIG), who escaped shunt diversion and had quick resolution of ascites using BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Case 1 is a 5-month-old male who presented with vomiting, nystagmus, and macrocephaly. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed metastatic suprasellar mass and hydrocephalus (Figure 1: Case 1). VPS was inserted, and 6 days later ascites occurred. VPS was externalized till ascites resolved (19 days), then tumor biopsy with shunt internalization was performed. Pathology was DIA, BRAFv600E-mutated. Fourteen days later, ascites recurred, and a peritoneal drain was inserted. Dabrafenib was started, and ascites resolved (Table 1). CSF: 177–450 mg/dL Ascites: 0.5–0.9 g/dL -CT brain: no hydrocephalus -Abdominal ultrasound/CT confirmed ascites with no loculations -CSF and peritoneal samples were negative for bacterial infections and malignant cells -1st Event: temporary shunt externalization -2nd Event: peritoneal drain insertion and started compassionate dabrafenib (5.25 mg/kg/day) CSF: 45–60 mg/dL Ascites: 1.4 g/dL -CT brain: no hydrocephalus -Abdominal ultrasound/CT confirmed ascites with no loculations -CSF and peritoneal samples were negative for bacterial infections and malignant cells -1st Event: temporary shunt externalization and peritoneal drain insertion -2nd Event: peritoneal drain insertion and started compassionate combined dabrafenib (5.25 mg/kg/day) and trametinib (0.032 mg/kg/day) Case 2 is a 4-month-old male who presented with irritability, vomiting, and macrocephaly. MRI showed left hemispheric multicystic solid mass (Figure 1: Case 2). Partial tumor resection was complicated by convulsions and intratumoral bleeding. Pathology was DIG, BRAF p.G469A-mutated. VPS was inserted 6 weeks later, but needed three revisions in 2 months due to malfunction with high CSF protein (52–571 mg/dL). Chemotherapy11 was started, with variable cystic response after 6 months. Partial tumor resection and ommaya insertion were performed; thereafter, the patient was observed. Ascites developed 9 months later. VPS was externalized, and a peritoneal drain was inserted. With ascites resolution (2 weeks), VPS was internalized. A week later, ascites recurred, and peritoneal drain was inserted. Combined dabrafenib and trametinib were started and ascites resolved (Table 1). VPS-associated ascites usually needs shunt diversion to be controlled. Our two patients received targeted therapies to control their tumors, hoping that this happens quick enough and helps control their noninfectious nonmalignant ascites. Ascites was controlled quickly (within 3 weeks) and saved these children the challenges of VAS insertion, the least of which is the need for recurrent shunt revisions at their young age. This seems to support the role of high CSF protein associated with large tumor burden on the pathophysiology of ascites. Our experience suggests that trial of targeted therapy is a plausible medical alternative, particularly when there are technical challenges associated with VAS insertion. A literature review12 identified 21 children with optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) who developed ascites at a median of 5 months from shunt insertion; 19 needed shunt diversion. Ascites was controlled without shunt diversion in few patients,7 in the literature though it was not clear if these patients received any tumor-directed therapy. In other cases, the addition of chemotherapy seemed to play a role in controlling ascites. Kretschmar and Linggood6 reported an OPG and malignant ascites, which resolved with intensive chemotherapy in 1 week coinciding with tumor shrinkage. Legault et al.13 reported on a disseminated LGG (without BRAFv600E or KIAA1549-BRAF) and VPS that developed recurrent ascites while receiving sorafenib. Ascites occurred at 4 weeks, resolved with stopping sorafenib and recurred on resuming it. The tumor progressed on sorafenib, so treatment was shifted to bevacizumab/irinotecan. Ascites did not recur (>19 months). This was reported as a possible sorafenib-related complication, though it may be argued that ascites occurred secondary to tumor growth on sorafenib, which was reported to cause “paradoxical” acceleration of LGG growth.14 Solano-Páez et al.12 collected data on 19 children with non-NF1 nonmetastatic LGG (17 were OPGs) with shunt ascites. Eight patients received dabrafenib or trametinib to control their tumor growth post ascites. In addition to targeted therapy use (which was exclusive in four patients), four patients received other modalities of therapies (chemotherapy [3], surgery [1], radiotherapy [1]). Five of the eight patients had shunt diversion to control their ascites. The three patients who did not have shunt diversion were: one with BRAFv600E mutated OPG who was on dabrafenib before developing ascites, which was treated conservatively, a critically ill infant with BRAFv600E mutated OPG and diencephalic syndrome who developed tumor progression on vinblastine and then had profound clinical and radiological response on dabrafenib,15 and the third patient had KIAA1549-BRAF-OPG for which trametinib was used after ascites was drained with repeated paracentesis; however, with further tumor progression she received multiple lines of chemotherapy. In conclusion, we present two patients in whom we successfully controled shunt ascites medically with targeted therapy and were able to avoid shunt diversion. This seems an effective alternative when the underlying molecular alteration is identified and targeted therapy is available. We would like to thank Novartis for providing compassionate access to dabrafenib/trametinib to our patients. We also thank the KHCC-pharmacy personnel for facilitating drug shipments. Eric Bouffet is a member of the advisory board of Novartis and Alexion. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePediatric Blood & CancerMême sujetGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207