MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4396972460 · doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1429246

Editorial: Bone metastases and secondary osteoporosis

2024· editorial· en· W4396972460 sur OpenAlexaff
Qiang Huo, Shan Wang, Lihong Guo, Yining Shen, Reginald M. Gorczynski, Qiaoli Zhai, Liang Li, Lei Zhang, Tao Li

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Endocrinology · 2024
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBone health and treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineOsteoporosisInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Bone metastasis (BM) is one of the most common complications of malignancies, and axial bone is reported as the most frequent location of metastasis (1). Bone is a dynamic tissue, and bone remodeling is crucial not only to replace primary with secondary bones, but also to repair skeleton microdamage and ensure normal calcium homeostasis (2). Osteoporosis is characterized by deterioration of bone density and architecture, along with increased fracture risk, which is correlated with the imbalanced activation of bone formation and bone resorption that closely related to the biological activities of osteoblasts and osteoclasts (3). On the other hand, both osteoporosis and periodontitis, a periodontal disease that represents a chronic inflammation of the periodontal tissue and alveolar bone, are inflammation-driven, age-related bone disorders, and recent studies have provided compelling evidence to support the correlation between systemic and alveolar bone loss.The mechanistic links, shared risk factors, and therapeutic implications have been investigated in both diseases, and age-related oxidative stress and senescence are considered underlying mechanisms that cause the uncoupling of bone remodeling process (4).Skeletal-related events (SREs) usually refer to major complications of tumor bone disease such as pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia, the need for radiotherapy and/or surgery, and the like (5). Since osteoblasts and osteoclasts play important roles in bone remodeling, which is highly similar to the inflammatory process, the interactions between osteoblasts, osteoclasts, malignant cells and immune cells are considered crucial for bone metastasis (6). Secondary osteoporosis refers to osteoporosis caused by diseases, drug treatment, or other reasons. The main clinical symptoms include osteopenia, bone microstructure changes, increased bone fragility and easy fracture (7). Bone mineral density (BMD) has been recognized as the gold standard for diagnosis of osteoporosis. In addition, trabecular bone score (TBS), or TBS in combination with BMD, have also been shown clinically effective for osteoporosis and fracture management (8).Previous studies have suggested that bone metastasis is an important factor causing secondary osteoporosis, which is associated with decreased quality of life and increased medical costs, adding great medical burdens to both patients and our society. The treatment strategies of secondary osteoporosis caused by various malignancies are dissimilar, but most of them involve the application of intravenous or oral bisphosphonates, and denosumab (9,10).Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most diagnosed female cancers, and bone metastases usually occurred in breast cancer patients. Whether palliative radiotherapy could improve the prognosis of metastatic patients remains unclear. Xueting Li and colleagues collected 488 metastatic breast cancer patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive diagnosis and anti-HER2 targeted therapy, to explore the clinical efficacy of palliative local radiotherapy in these patients. This observational study demonstrated that patients in the radiotherapy group got better overall survival (OS) than those in the non-radiotherapy group, and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis also confirmed the prognostic superiority in 135 pairs of baseline-matched cases. On the other hand, the authors also identified another two predictive factors, brain and liver metastasis, associated with OS in HER2 positive breast cancer patients using multivariate Cox regression models. Their research indicated that local radiotherapy was associated with longer survival time in patients who were diagnosed with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer and treated with anti-HER2 therapy.Despite being the mainstay of hormonal therapy (HT) in post-menopausal breast cancers, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) which block the hormone-mediated growth signals are considered detrimental to bone health, inducing cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) and leading to secondary osteoporosis. Another observational clinical study conducted by Antonio Galvano and colleagues retrospectively identified fifty early-stage BC patients with osteopenia and estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive (ER+ and/or PR+) diagnoses. Those cases were treated with AIs to prevent progression and metastasis, and bone modifying agents (BMAs) including denosumab or alendronate to prevent secondary osteoporosis. The authors demonstrated that the application of BMAs such as alendronate could significantly improve the BMD then preventing secondary osteoporosis at the lumbar spine levels, and impact pain control, recommending alendronate as an option in these frail BC settings.Innovative tools were also included in our collection. The necessity of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for patients with T1-2N1M0 breast cancer remains controversial. Jin et al. trained and developed two machine learning survival models using a training dataset including 35,347 patients with HR+/HER2-early-stage breast cancer who had received mastectomy. Based on their deep learning neural network model, the authors identified key factors relating to patients' overall survival, including age, tumor size, positive regional nodes, and so forth. Meanwhile, the results also suggested that patients with tumor size over 14 mm and age older than 54 and the cohort with tumor size over 14 mm and grade worse than well-differentiated could benefit from the PMRT. The authors also developed a Cloud-based recommender system for PMRT and deployed it on the Internet (https://github.com/snowflake-Zhao/BRCA-I-PMRT), serving as a valuable tool when finding the most suitable adjuvant therapeutic strategy for BC patients. Whether primary tumor resection (PTR) should be recommended for BC patients with synchronous BM remains unclear. In Tong's study, 5,625 BC patients with BM were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, and were used to establish a visualized model for identifying optimal candidates for aggressive locoregional surgical treatment. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival and Cox regression analyses revealed that local surgery provided better survival in most subgroups and metastatic patterns. Surgery-benefit-related factors, including T stage, radiotherapy, race, liver metastasis, brain metastasis, and breast subtype, were identified by Logistic regression models and combined to establish the nomogram and an online tool for identifying optimal surgical candidates (probability calculator, https://sunshine1.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/), confirming the prognostic significance of aggressive locoregional surgery in BC patients with BM.In this Research Topic, we provided a forum for discussion on the relationship between bone metastasis and secondary osteoporosis. While collecting, we emphasized more on original research, and reviewed and collected excellent original works, which have advanced current knowledge both clinically and laboratorially. Understanding the association between these diseases and their interplay calls for more well-controlled studies to explore their mechanistic links, interdisciplinary management, and potential therapeutics.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,025
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,084

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,015
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0040,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,003
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0060,005
Science ouverte0,0040,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0140,015
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0250,020

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,282
Écart entre enseignants0,273 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in EndocrinologyMême sujetBone health and treatmentsTravaux en français237 207