Patient Satisfaction: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) can be seen in almost every aspect of the healthcare system, as it has potential to affect almost every facet of the healthcare, from detection of ailments and serious or complex chronic diseases to their control, prevention and cure. With technological innovations, upgradation and adoption in the field of healthcare, healthcare professionals are required to be well prepared to accept the continuously evolving technology and its application to provide best healthcare facilities, which gave rise to the various studies on the role of the machine learning (ML), AI, deep learning (DL), etc., in the field of healthcare. Similarly, the rise in digitalised hospitals, medical facilities, records and data has resulted in the improvisation in the field of healthcare, which in turn has increased the need of experts, professionals, experienced and digitally literate workforce teams in the field of entire healthcare system. Understanding the roles of these advanced technologies, impacts being created on the health, lifestyle and the entire healthcare system, along with the perception of the patients towards it, will shape the way for the improvements and the applications of AI and its outcomes to be achieved, resulting in healthier world for the patients and the society. The objective of the study is to create a patient satisfaction model and validate it with respect to factors influencing patient satisfaction of several patients undergoing AI treatment factors. In the study, the United States, Canada, Australia, UAE and China were chosen as a place of survey, as these are advanced countries and the use of AI is highest in these countries compared to other countries, and survey was done with the help of structured questionnaire. In our earlier study, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed for initial knowledge development on the construct of patients undergoing AI treatment. Patient satisfaction rests on six broad dimensions: First factor is personal touch (PT), second factor is comprehensive gap (CG), third factor is answerability (AB), fourth factor is nerve racking (NR), fifth factor is wrong reporting (WR) and sixth factor is enlightened (EL). With the help of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structured equation modelling (SEM), it has emerged from the study that patient satisfaction level of the construct suggests that PT will have a greater impact on patient satisfaction, and it is the most significant factor of patient satisfaction compared to other constructs. Thus, we can conclude that PT still remains the most important factor in the minds of patients before undergoing AI treatment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».