Abstract A007: Circulating tumor DNA and tissue staining analyses reveal heterogeneous <i>ERBB2</i>/HER2 status in urothelial cancer
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is encoded by the ERBB2 gene, and frequently mutated, amplified, and/or overexpressed in urothelial cancer (UC). Promising antibody-drug conjugates have led to new interest in HER2 as a UC clinical target. Patient selection for HER2-targeted therapy typically relies on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) of tumor tissue, however DNA sequencing can identify ERBB2 genomic alterations. Accurate biomarker-driven patient selection will be critical to optimize the clinical benefit of HER2-targeted therapy. Therefore, we evaluated plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for ERBB2/HER2 status determination in UC, as compared to IHC and FISH of metachronous tissue. 411 plasma samples from 236 metastatic UC patients were profiled with targeted sequencing across >50 genes frequently altered in UC, including dense coverage flanking the ERBB2 locus. Using an established bioinformatics workflow, we determined the presence of ERBB2 alterations (mutations, amplifications, and/or structural variants) in the 181 patients with evidence of ctDNA in ≥1 sample. Clinical records were reviewed for the availability of archival tumor tissue; in total, 81 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were retrieved from 23 patients with ctDNA ERBB2 alterations and 20 ERBB2-wildtype controls. HER2 IHC was performed with a polyclonal rabbit anti-human Her2 antibody (Dako) and scored according to gastric cancer guidelines. HER2 FISH was performed with the PathVysion HER-2 DNA Probe Kit. Protein-altering ERBB2 mutations were identified in 14% of evaluable patients, with two-thirds at known oncogenic hotspots. ERBB2 copy gain was detected in 8% of patients overall, 9% when excluding low tumor fraction samples. IHC results were assessable for 82 tissue samples from 43 patients, and 33 patients had at least one sample with positive HER2 staining (2+/3+). IHC scores varied in 16/23 patients with ≥2 tissue samples, with the variation leading to a change in classification (HER2-negative [0/1+] versus positive [2+/3+]) in half (8/16). In two patients with mixed variant histology, the urothelial component showed IHC 3+ while the scores were 2+ (plasmacytoid) and 0 (squamous) in the variant regions. Frequent focal staining patterns were observed with both IHC and FISH. ERBB2 alterations in ctDNA were correlated with IHC positivity – when considering the most recent tissue sample per patient, 79% of ctDNA ERBB2-altered patient’s tumors were also positive by IHC. Conversely, 55% of ctDNA ERBB2-wildtype cases were positive by IHC. FISH results were available from 24 samples (20 positive, 4 negative), all from patients with ctDNA ERBB2 amplification. 18/20 samples with FISH positivity were HER2 IHC 2+/3+; the remaining two samples were IHC 1+. Our results demonstrate significant spatial and/or temporal heterogeneity in ERBB2/HER2 status, with implications for the rational implementation of biomarker-directed (HER2-targeted) therapy in UC. Citation Format: Gillian Vandekerkhove, Andrew J. Murtha, David C. Müller, Kimia Rostin, Carlos Vasquez-Rios, Jussi Nikkola, Maria Stephenson, Emily Fung, Jaskirat Atwal, Karan Parekh, Cecily Q. Bernales, Gráinne Donnellan, Gang Wang, Tilman Todenhöfer, Piet Ost, Peter C. Black, Kim N. Chi, Bernhard J. Eigl, Alexander W. Wyatt. Circulating tumor DNA and tissue staining analyses reveal heterogeneous ERBB2/HER2 status in urothelial cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Bladder Cancer: Transforming the Field; 2024 May 17-20; Charlotte, NC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2024;30(10_Suppl):Abstract nr A007.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».