Physical Activity Perceptions and Practices of People Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis: An International Cross-Sectional Survey
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Life participation is a core patient-reported outcome for people receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) that is dependent on physical activity engagement and adequate physical function. Little is known about exercise practice patterns or perceptions of people receiving PD. The aim was to describe the physical activity and exercise practices and perceptions of people receiving PD to inform patient education, future areas of research, and clinical recommendations. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive, web-based 25 item survey (16 perception and practice questions, 9 demographic questions) was co-developed and pilot tested by persons living with kidney disease, PD clinicians and exercise specialists. Adults who currently or previously received PD were invited to participate in the survey. Recruitment was completed through national and international kidney organization websites and social media platforms. All variables were reported descriptively, and free text responses were collated and summarized. Results: There were 114 respondents, 6 excluded due to duplication or incompletion, the majority were from Canada (68%), United Kingdom (25%) and 7% other. Women represented 55% of respondents, with most 50-64 years old (43.5%). Forty-one percent received PD for 1-3 years and 72.9% had post secondary education. Physical activity was felt to be beneficial by 91.8% of respondents and 40% reported they had good physical function (could walk an unlimited distance without stopping). Variable medical advice regarding swimming and weightlifting emerged: 44% were told they could or could not swim, and respondents were told to limit weight lifting from 2 to 45 kg. A minority of respondents reported receiving instructions on draining PD fluid prior to physical activity (28% yes, 53% no, 19% unsure). Conclusions: Survey respondents were knowledgeable regarding benefits of exercise and physical activity on physical and mental health for people receiving PD. Knowledge gaps emerged including maximum weightlifting, whether exercise was safe with or without intrabdominal PD fluid in situ, and whether swimming is allowed. Education for both health care providers and patients is needed regarding the practice of exercise for people receiving PD.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».