Vascular responses during handgrip exercise in healthy postmenopausal females and older males
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Aerobic exercise interventions improve peripheral endothelial function in healthy older males. However, this effect is not always observed in healthy postmenopausal females and possible mechanisms underlying this sex-related difference remain unknown. Greater vascular shear stress during acute exercise is a key stimulus mediating longer-term improvements in vascular function. It remains unknown if postmenopausal females display a reduced endothelial sensitivity to exercise-induced shear stress relative to males of similar age. Objective and hypothesis: The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that healthy postmenopausal females exhibit a lower endothelial sensitivity to exercise-induced shear stress relative to males. Methods: Fourteen healthy postmenopausal females (67 ± 8 years) not under hormone replacement therapy and 9 males of similar age (65 ± 7 years) performed handgrip exercise for 4 minutes at 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% of their maximal voluntary contraction. Each exercise bout was separated by a 10-min recovery period. Brachial artery diameter and blood velocity were continuously measured using high-resolution ultrasound and analyzed using edge-detection software. Endothelial sensitivity to shear rate was quantified as the slope of the linear regression between brachial artery dilation (% change from baseline) and shear stress and compared between groups with an independent t-test. Workload, vascular conductance, diameter dilation, and shear stress were analyzed with mixed-effects models. Results: Males exercised at greater workloads relative to females across all exercise bouts (M: 17 ± 11 vs. F: 9 ± 5 kg, p<0.01). Forearm vascular conductance was greater in males throughout each exercise intensity (M: 2.23 ± 1.70 vs. F: 1.03 ± 0.51 ml/min/mmHg, p=0.02). Despite these differences, arterial dilation (M: 5.32 ± 5.55 vs. F: 5.20 ± 4.80%, p=0.96) and shear stress (M: 142 ± 80 vs. F: 171 ± 86 s −1 , p=0.27) did not differ between groups across exercise intensities. Endothelial sensitivity to exercise-induced shear stress did not differ between males (0.02 ± 0.05%/s −1 ) and females (0.03 ± 0.01%/s −1 , p=0.67). Conclusion: These data suggest that a reduced endothelial sensitivity to exercise-induced shear stress may not explain why aerobic exercise interventions do not consistently improve peripheral endothelial function in healthy postmenopausal females. Montreal Heart Institute Foundation. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».