Acute Intermittent Hypoxia Induces Chemoreflex-Independent Sympathetic Plasticity and Improves Cardiovascular Function in a Rodent Model of Spinal Cord Injury
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Cardiovascular complications are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Activation of spinal sympathetic circuitry is critical to offset cardiovascular dysregulation and disease in those with high-level SCI. Acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) elicits plasticity (i.e., a gradual increase in nerve activity post-AIH exposure) in phrenic and non-phrenic spinal motor circuitry and improves motor function — yet the cardiovascular benefits of AIH after SCI are largely unexplored. Aims: Determine mechanisms (Aim 1) and potential benefits (Aim 2) of AIH-induced sympathetic plasticity post-SCI. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that AIH elicits chemoreflex-dependent sympathetic plasticity and improves cardiovascular function in rats with SCI. Methods: For Aim 1, 40 adult (10-12 weeks) male Wistar rats were subjected to a spinal cord contusion injury (T3, 300 kdyn) and randomly assigned to 5 groups of 8 each: AIH alone, AIH after carotid body denervation (CBX, no peripheral chemoreflex), time control with no intervention (TC), simulated hemorrhage (to mimic AIH-induced hypotension), and AIH plus phenylephrine (to prevent hypotension during hypoxic episodes). Two weeks post-SCI recovery, rats were anesthetized with urethane (~2.1g.kg −1 i.v.) and underwent femoral venous and arterial catheterizations to monitor blood pressure (BP), sample arterial blood gases, and enable intravenous fluid and drug delivery. Additionally, splanchnic sympathetic nerve activity (sSNA) was recorded using a suction electrode at baseline and for up to 90-min following each experimental paradigm. AIH consisted of 10 x 1 min episodes of F i O 2 = 0.1 (balanced N 2 ) interspersed with 2 min of F i O 2 = 1. Hexamethonium bromide (30 mg.kg −1 ) was infused to subtract noise levels from each recording, after which rats were euthanized with chloral hydrate. For Aim 2, 19 additional rats were subjected to the same injury model and time post-injury and allocated to 2 groups: AIH ( n = 11) and TC ( n = 8). These rats were instrumented with left-ventricular (LV) and arterial catheters and assessed simultaneously for cardiac and peripheral hemodynamic function at baseline and 90-min post-AIH/TC. Results: Aim 1) When expressed as % change from baseline, sSNA increased at 90-min post-treatment in AIH (93±67%, P = 0.02) and CBX (193±182%, P < 0.001), but not TC rats (50±45%, P = 0.40). Preventing BP reduction during hypoxic episodes with i.v. phenylephrine blocked the increase in sSNA 90-min post-AIH (12±66%, P > 0.99). Mimicking the AIH-induced BP reduction with simulated hemorrhage (10 x 1-min BP reductions of ~20-25 mmHg equal to those during AIH, interspersed by 2-min of euvolemia), increased sSNA 90-min post-intervention (106±86%, P = 0.01). Aim 2) The changes in maximal LV pressure (AIH = 11±8 mmHg vs. TC = 2±5 mmHg, P = 0.05) and mean arterial pressure (AIH = 8±7 mmHg vs. TC = 0±4 mmHg, P = 0.05) were greater at 90-min post-AIH treatment. Conclusions: We conclude that AIH elicits sympathetic plasticity and improves cardiovascular function post-SCI. Since AIH-induced sympathetic plasticity remains in the presence of a bilateral CBX, is replicated by episodic simulated hemorrhage, and is blocked by phenylephrine, AIH-induced sympathetic plasticity is independent of carotid (peripheral) chemoreflex activation, and is closely linked to episodic hypotension. We suggest that AIH-induced sympathetic plasticity arises from episodic reductions in spinal/medullary cardiovascular centers blood flow (and oxygen delivery) post-SCI. International Spinal Research Trust and Natural Sciences, Engineering Research Council of Canada, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».