Comprehensive Assessment of the Impact of Alcohol Use on Cognitive Deficits in People with HIV
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection profoundly impacts the nervous system, leading to neurological deficits such as HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). HAND represents the most common neurological comorbidity among people with HIV (PWH), and alcohol use may exacerbate the cognitive deficits seen in this condition, especially in underserved populations. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between alcohol use patterns and cognitive performance in an underserved cohort of PWH, with the hypothesis that alcohol misuse would exacerbate cognitive deficits in this population. Data collected from participants (n=259; 66.7% male; mean age 52 ± 10 years) enrolled in the New Orleans Alcohol Use in HIV (NOAH) study were utilized for cross-sectional analysis. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and alcohol use was comprehensively measured by four metrics: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), 30-day timeline followback (TLFB), lifetime drinking history, and phosphatidylethanol (PEth) levels. The average MoCA score among participants was 20.7 ± 4.5, with 86.5% demonstrating cognitive impairment (MoCA < 26). Notably, individuals with total MoCA scores below 18 (classified as moderately or severely cognitively impaired) had a higher frequency of recent severe alcohol misuse (as assessed by PEth levels) and greater lifetime alcohol consumption. Participants at increased risk for AUD (as assessed by the AUDIT) also had worse global cognition and memory task performance, particularly those aged 50 and older. Further analysis of MoCA sub-score data indicated that participants with increased AUD risk had significant impairments in the cognitive domains of language, delayed recall, and memory. These findings highlight the importance of considering alcohol use and AUD risk as important factors that may exacerbate cognitive decline in vulnerable populations, including older patients and PWH. Future analyses will compare the relationship between cognition and alcohol in these HIV-positive patients with a cohort of HIV-negative patients to better understand the impact of concurrent HIV and alcohol misuse on cognitive function. This research was supported by grant #F30AA030941, #T32AA007577, and #P60AA009803 from the NIAAA at the National Institutes of Health. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».