MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4398184199 · doi:10.2166/wh.2024.002

Ensuring safe drinking water: converting commitment into action and foresight

2024· article· en· W4398184199 sur OpenAlexaff
Steve E. Hrudey, María J. Gunnarsdóttir, Annalisa Contos, Susan Petterson

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Water and Health · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiquePatient Safety and Medication Errors
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAction (physics)Futures studiesBusinessEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental planningComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

20 years have passed since the World Health Organization (WHO) published its third edition of Guidelines for Drinkingwater Quality (WHO 2004), a major advance in the guidance for water-providers to ensure safe drinking water.This advance was the product of more than a decade of international discussion about how to better prevent contamination of drinking water by adopting a preventive risk management approach.The prevailing perspectives about ensuring safe drinking water in the 1990s had been dominated by a primary focus on setting and meeting quantitative limits for an expanding list of water contaminants monitored in finished drinking water.This approach is inherently reactive rather than preventive because treated water monitoring is not continuous for most contaminants and results are normally not available until after the drinking water has been consumed.Drinking water guidelines needed to be restructured to provide a fundamentally preventive risk management approach developed to achieve health-based targets.Those guidelines also needed to establish a more realistic balance for microbial pathogens versus chemical contaminants.That balance needed to recognize the substantial and certain evidence that pathogens in drinking water cause adverse human health outcomes versus the much more uncertain evidence for most chemical contaminants.The latter mainly warrant control from a precautionary public health perspective rather than the certain drinking water health risks of pathogens confirmed by experience.An early influential proposal to improve the capability of drinking water guidelines was provided by Havelaar (1994) suggesting a risk management approach for drinking water guidelines modeled on what had been adopted internationally for food safety.This approach was pursued by some European nations (e.g., Iceland, Switzerland).Dr. Jamie Bartram, in charge of the WHO drinking water guidelines program sought adoption of a risk management approach and led a major international effort to address improvements that was addressed by a 1999 expert meeting in Stockholm where foundational concepts for water safety plans (WSPs) were developed (Bartram et al. 2001;Deere et al. 2001).Meanwhile, Australia was also pursuing a risk and total quality management-oriented restructuring of its national drinking water guidelines after the 1998 'Sydney Water Crisis' (Clancy 2000) by means of a working group established by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) from 1999 to 2002 (Rizak et al. 2003).These parallel initiatives led to a week-long joint meeting of the WHO expert group with the NHMRC working group in Adelaide in May 2001 to compare their respective risk management approaches.These activities also led the founders of the Global Water Research Coalition (https:// globalwaterresearchcoalition.net) to initiate the creation of the Bonn Network that resulted in the 2004 Bonn Charter for Safe Drinking Water (IWA 2004) and an international conference in Berlin in April 2003(Schmoll & Chorus 2003) that elaborated on and promoted a risk management approach to ensuring safe drinking water.Ultimately, these risk management initiatives became official with the publication of the third edition of the WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality (WHO 2004) that formally introduced the concept of WSPs and the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (NHMRC 2004) that were fundamentally restructured to incorporate a Framework for Management of Drinking Water Quality.WHO and IWA sponsored and launched an online resource to provide access to resources in support of water safety planning (https://wsportal.org).Major documentation about the objectives and means to implement WSPs effectively was published (Davison et al. 2005; Howard & Schmoll 2006) and the first edition of the WHO Water Safety Plan manual (Bartram et al. 2009) was introduced at an IWA-WHO Conference on Water Safety Plans -Global Experiences and Future Trends in Lisbon in May 2008.Experience and insights about water safety planning were captured by Breach (2012) and guidance for WSPs for small drinking water supplies was published (WHO 2012).Rickert et al. (2016) provided an overview of how risks for surface water supplies can be assessed and managed with WSPs.A little more than a decade after the formal publication of the WSP concept in 2004, WHO (2017) published a survey reporting that 93 countries in every region of the world had adopted WSPs at least to some degree of implementation.IWA sponsored another water safety conference in Narvik, Norway in June 2022 (IWA 2022).The second enlarged edition of the WHO Water Safety Plan Manual (Jackson et al. 2023) with contributions from 83 water professionals from 35 nations was

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,852
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,471

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,122
Tête enseignante GPT0,443
Écart entre enseignants0,322 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Water and HealthMême sujetPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsTravaux en français237 207