MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4398226641 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2023.a927885

Writing for Social Change in Temperance Periodicals: Conviction and Career by Annemarie McAllister (review)

2023· article· en· W4398226641 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emma Liggins

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian periodicals review · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueNarrative Theory and Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConvictionSociologyAestheticsEpistemologyPsychoanalysisPsychologyLawPhilosophyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Writing for Social Change in Temperance Periodicals: Conviction and Career by Annemarie McAllister Emma Liggins (bio) Annemarie McAllister, Writing for Social Change in Temperance Periodicals: Conviction and Career ( London: Routledge, 2023), pp. 167, $160.00/£125.00 hardcover, $54.99/£39.99 paperback and e-book. The temperance movement in the nineteenth century, and its advocates who championed total abstinence from alcohol for the purposes of social reform, have often been sidelined in the historical record. Yet, as this fascinating new study shows, the flourishing national network of journalists and lecturers in the UK needs to be more widely known in the context of its contributions to the development and diversity of the temperance press. Building on her tireless research into temperance history, Annemarie McAllister's Writing for Social Change in Temperance Periodicals: Conviction and Career maps the careers of seven representative figures whose journalism, performances, and creativity put them at the forefront of radical campaigning against the evils of alcohol. Temperance periodicals were widely read and circulated, with seventy titles in circulation by 1890. McAllister shows how content also drew from and reprinted material from other reform movements, such as animal rights and campaigns for antislavery and suffrage. The discourses of science, Christianity, slum clearance, and pacifism all found their way into temperance writing. The propagandist nature of this content cannot be underestimated, as McAllister argues: "The imperative to attract and retain readers required successful propaganda to be arresting and entertaining" (5). The book covers the 1840s to the 1930s, showing how the rise of New Journalism and the impact of the First World War affected the movement. It successfully builds on research into Victorian attitudes to alcohol and abstinence as well as representations of working-class culture by historians such as Brian Harrison, Peter Keating, and Brian Maidment. Working-class in its origins, the total abstinence movement continued to "represent personal, social and economic empowerment for many" (4). By examining the attractive aspects for both leaders and ordinary members of a movement that was sometimes misleadingly perceived as overtly [End Page 513] moralistic, this study has a lot to tell us about the social purposes of popular entertainment and how careers were forged in print culture. The interest for periodical scholars lies in the careful analysis of a number of neglected publications in the temperance press, based on extensive archival research on a set of periodicals still not digitised. The widespread impact of the Band of Hope, a temperance organisation for working-class children founded in Leeds in 1847, is apparent in long-running monthlies such as the Band of Hope Review (1851–1937) and Onward (1865–1910), which are at the heart of this study. The Band of Hope Chronicle, founded in 1878, offered more in the way of instructing conductors and volunteers. This group certainly deserves to be more well known. Discussions of editorial personae and speculations about the authorship of unsigned articles and columns all add to the complex picture of a collaborative network of temperance writers. The lack of images in the study unfortunately means that the reader does not gain a full appreciation of the format and branding of these periodicals or the key differences between monthly and weekly papers. A little more discussion of the ways in which literary and editorial material was in dialogue with other contents, such as meeting reports, advertisements, and reviews, would have been interesting in terms of arguments about the other voices besides the writers raised in the introduction. Shining a spotlight onto four men and three women, McAllister provides detailed biographies and evaluations of the varied careers of journalists and public speakers. Many were based in the north of England. The emphasis on "writing as political or social activism" and the link between speaking and writing are key to McAllister's approach, which often involves enumerating how many lectures the speakers delivered and how far they travelled on their lecture tours (1). Some of them juggled parallel careers, while others contributed steadily on a voluntary basis to the temperance press. How much writers were paid and how they developed their commercial reputations, sometimes in the fields of fiction, music, or science writing, is very...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,426
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,090
Tête enseignante GPT0,329
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian periodicals reviewMême sujetNarrative Theory and AnalysisTravaux en français237 207