#594 Long-term risk of incident/progressive chronic kidney disease, or end-stage kidney disease post-acute kidney injury: systematic review, meta-analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background and Aims Little is known about which patients to follow-up after an episode of acute kidney injury (AKI) for future risks. The aim of this review is to assess the association between AKI and the incidence or progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), stratified by subcategories of AKI-stages, -durations, and clinical settings. Method A systematic search of the literature in PubMed and Embase was performed by two reviewers to identify studies that examined CKD incidence (development of CKD stage ≥3), CKD progression (worsening of kidney function in patients with CKD stage ≥3), or ESKD, in patients with AKI versus patients without AKI. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Relative effect estimates (odds and hazard ratios) were pooled using a random effects model. Results In total, 48 retrospective and 13 prospective studies, encompassing 140.985 patients with AKI, were included in this review. All the studies were of moderate or high quality. The pooled effect ratio was 3.36 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.68-4.03) for CKD incidence (n = 31 studies). This remained 3.40 (95% CI 1.79-5.00) in a sub analysis including patients with a recovered kidney function post-AKI, and 1.49 (95% CI 1.44-1.55) in a sub analysis including patients with an AKI lasting less than 3 days (Fig. 1). Overall, the effect ratio for CKD progression (n = 11 studies) was 1.70 (95% CI 1.38-2.01) and 3.81 (95% CI 2.58-5.04) for ESKD (n = 24 studies). The increased risk of these two outcomes were not seen in the sub analyses only including patients with AKI lasting less than 3 days. Overall, there is an observable higher risk for CKD incidence, CKD progression, and ESKD with increased AKI staging, although not always statistically significant. Minimal variations were observed across clinical settings. Conclusion In our review, including over 60 studies, we found that AKI was associated with an increased risk of CKD incidence, CKD progression, and ESKD. Patients with higher AKI-stages had even larger risks. Notably, even brief episodes of AKI (lasting less than 3 days) were associated with a higher risk of CKD incidence compared to patients without AKI. In contrary, the risk for ESKD is not enlarged in a sub analysis including patients with recovered kidney function compared to patients without AKI. These result warrant close monitoring of the kidney function post-AKI, specifically in patients with AKI lasting 3 days or longer. Future research should focus more on the risk of CKD progression in order to tailor follow-up care in these more vulnerable patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,013 | 0,039 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,016 | 0,029 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».