#627 C3 glomerulonephritis and C3-dominant infection related glomerulonephritis—are they similar?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) and C3 dominant infection related glomerulonephritis (C3-IRGN) comprise two important immune complex mediated diseases. C3GN is caused by dysregulation of the alternate pathway by congenital or acquired abnormalities in the complement pathway. C3-IRGN is often preceded by infection followed by recovery after the infection resolves. Although kidney biopsy findings may be similar in both conditions, the clinical course and treatment differs. We aimed to compare the demographic, clinical and lab parameters of C3GN and C3-IRGN. Methods All kidney biopsies conducted at Institute of Nephrourology, Bengaluru with dominant C3 on immunofluorescence from Jan. 2019-Dec. 2022 were included. The diagnosis of C3-IRGN was established using established criteria. Patients with C3GN had persistently low C3 for more than 12 weeks and no identifiable source of infection. Patients with C3GN were treated with steroids and cyclophosphamide, while those with C3-IRGN received antibiotics along with supportive medical management (including renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibition). Demographic, clinical and lab parameters were recorded and compared. Results 23 cases of C3-IRGN and 19 cases of C3GN were included in the study. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.79 ± 0.92 years for those with C3GN and 2.78 ± 0.90 years for those with C3-IRGN. C3GN was common in younger patients (second decade of life) while C3-IRGN was common in the fourth and fifth decades of life. C3GN (57.9%) and C3-IRGN (73.9%) were both common in males. Previous infection (26.1% vs 5.3%) and present infection (39.1% vs 15.8%) were significantly more common in C3-IRGN. Hematuria (52.6% vs 34.8%), patient reported “frothy” urine (47.4% vs 21.7%) was significantly more common in C3GN compared to C3-IRGN. 36.8% of patients with C3GN had IFTA of >50% compared to only 8.7% in C3-IRGN. Patients with both conditions most commonly presented with either acute nephritic syndrome or rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. In contrast, presentation with CKD was significantly more common in C3GN (36.8% vs 0%, P = 0.002) compared to C3-IRGN, and patients with C3GN were more likely to require kidney replacement therapy (47.4% vs 21.7%, P = 0.002). At the end of follow up, 65.2% of patients with C3-IRGN attained complete recovery, compared with only 47.4% of C3GN patients. Conclusion There are characteristic differences between individuals with C3-IRGN and C3GN that may help to better ascertain diagnosis at presentation. Patients with C3GN tend to have worse prognosis, emphasizing the importance of treatments to slow CKD progression and avoid the need for kidney replacement therapy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».