AV synchrony maintained by a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker in real-world conditions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background/Introduction A dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system has been developed to provide atrial and ventricular pacing and maintain atrioventricular (AV) synchrony. The device demonstrated an ability to maintain consistent AV synchrony in an in-clinic setting when tested through a series of postures and gaits under some programming restrictions. Assessing AV synchrony within real-world conditions is needed to understand the device’s performance under wider variations in activity and over a longer period. Purpose Assess a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker’s ability to maintain AV synchrony in an ambulatory environment of daily living under clinically driven programmed settings. Methods Implanted de novo subjects, who had at least 25% atrial pacing after 3-months post-implant, wore a 12-lead Holter monitor for a minimum of 24 hours during normal daily activities and completed a symptom diary. Devices were programmed to a dual chamber pacing mode and clinically appropriate settings then interrogated pre- and post-assessment. An independent Core Laboratory evaluated AV Synchrony, based on a configurable sampling window approach at repeated intervals, and defined synchronous cycles based on whether PR intervals fell within a 50 ms margin of the programmed Paced AV Delay. Results Among the 50 subjects who were administered the assessment, 48 of their Holters were analyzable (mean age 71.4 ± 10.9 years; 66.7% male), and 47 subjects had paired device interrogation data available. The analyzable population was predominantly indicated for sinus node dysfunction (83.3%) with a minority indicated for AV block (16.7%). The mean ± standard deviation of the programmed paced AV delay was 260.0 ± 47.6 ms, and mean PR interval was 241.4 ± 35.1 ms. An atrial paced beat and ventricular paced beat were each present in 69.5% and 22.5% of the evaluable cardiac cycles in the population, respectively. Mean AV Synchrony was maintained above 97% (95% CI: 95.5, 98.8) in the entire cohort and was sustained at high rates within each sub-population. Device metrics that diagnose the rate of directional implant-to-implant (i2i) communication also confirmed device data average throughput rates above 90% (Picture 1). There were no reported episodes of oversensing, undersensing, loss of capture, or pauses. Conclusion Among subjects with standard pacemaker indications, the dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system maintains very high rates of AV synchrony, exceeding i2i throughput, within real-world conditions utilizing clinically appropriate programmed settings.AV Synchrony and i2i by Indication
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».