International consensus on early rehabilitation and nutritional management for infants at high risk of neurological impairments

Infants at high risk of neurological impairment (IHRNI) refer to those with in-utero, perinatal, or postnatal high-risk factors that cause motor, cognitive, and/or language delays, abnormal muscle tone and posture, swallowing disorders, problematic behaviors, or any other clinical symptoms related to neurological damage.1, 2 Although it is too early to determine the long-term prognosis in the early stage, these infants are at risk of developing permanent neurological impairments, such as cerebral palsy, intellectual disability, and neurodevelopmental disorders.1, 2 The “early stage” mentioned in this consensus mainly refers to the stage from 0 to 2 years of adjusted age. An Australian cohort study found that the survival rate of extremely premature infants increased from 50% to 73% between 1991 and 2017. However, the incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders among these infants remained high and was inversely related to gestational age.3 In the United States, a follow-up study of extremely premature infants indicated that 29.3% experienced moderate and 21.2% had severe neurodevelopmental impairments, with an incidence of 8.4% having moderate to severe cerebral palsy.4 It is difficult to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in early life. Consequently, the outcomes of IHRNI could vary from normal development to mild and severe neurological impairment. Despite the uncertainty, early intervention should be initiated when professionals identify neurological impairment-related clinical symptoms.5 In addition, IHRNI might be susceptible to undernutrition, which not only impedes their neurodevelopment but also reduces their quality of life. Effective management of their nutritional needs might lead to significant improvements in the well-being of the entire family. To date, there is limited standardized guidance available for the early rehabilitation and nutritional management of these infants. As a result, the optimal timing for interventions might be overlooked, potentially compromising functional outcomes. This consensus, built upon currently available evidence and expert opinions, aims to provide effective recommendations for early rehabilitation and nutritional management of IHRNI. This consensus was led by the Rehabilitation Group of the Pediatrics Society of the Chinese Medical Association in conjunction with a panel of international specialists. A total of 62 specialists with expertise in early rehabilitation and nutritional management from China, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Belgium participated and decided upon 10 key clinical issues centered around early detection, rehabilitation intervention, and nutritional management of IHRNI. We subsequently conducted a comprehensive literature search on these issues in Pubmed/MEDLINE and Foreign Medical Retrieval System. Article selection prioritized systematic review (SR) related to the clinical issues, followed by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). If neither a suitable SR nor RCTs are available, the best evidence of a lower tier waschosen. When few or no studies directly address the population of IHRNI, and the corresponding clinical questions remain unresolved, research on conditions such as cerebral palsy, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, prematurity risks, and neurodevelopmental disorders was considered. The selected research evidence and recommendations were graded using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine's method (Tables 1 and 2).6 All proposed recommendations and pertinent content underwent two rounds of significance evaluation based on the Delphi method.7 The initial round generated 60 recommendations derived from the 10 pre-determined clinical questions. These recommendations were then presented to the expert panel for evaluation via a questionnaire. Out of these, four recommendations did not achieve consensus. After incorporating new expert feedback, 14 recommendations were formulated in the second round, of which one did not gain consensus. After two rounds of Delphi assessment and expert group discussions, the final recommendations were consolidated. This consensus is officially registered on the website of the International Practice Guideline Registry Platform under the registration number PREPARE-2023CN488. Recommendation 1: The prognosis for IHRNI might worsen with more severe impairments in motor, cognition, eating, and nutritional status during the early stages. Additionally, the presence of more complex comorbidities at the early stage might negatively impact the prognosis further. Early detection and intervention could improve the prognosis. (Level I evidence, Grade A recommendation) IHRNI often exhibit developmental delays, hypertonia, abnormal posture, and swallowing disorders at an early stage, issues that could profoundly affect their daily lives and social interactions over the long term. Straathof et al.8 found that in infants with abnormal brain structure or those suspected of having neurological dysfunction clinically: (a) Over 90% exhibited delayed motor development during infancy, which becomes more pronounced with age; (b) Infants with better motor function tend to have better motor and social life skills during school age; (c) Improvements in motor function in infancy correlate with better cognitive function at school age. McGowan et al.9 found that high-risk premature infants (those who presented with two or more conditions like bronchopulmonary dysplasia and brain injury) had a 3–4 times higher risk of delayed motor and cognitive development at age two compared to the low-risk group. In a follow-up study on extremely premature infants at 4–5 years of age, Rinat et al.10 reported that those with early feeding difficulties demonstrated motor dysfunction in early childhood, which underscores the importance of early diagnosis and intervention of feeding and nutritional problems. Nutrition is crucial for infants’ development during the first 1000 days and subsequent years. For instance, iron deficiency anemia at an early stage could adversely affect an individual's motor development and have a more pronounced impact on their cognitive development after the age of 5 years.11, 12 A survey found that 50.8% of children with cerebral palsy experienced undernutrition, and this was correlated with the severity of their condition.13 Undernutrition is a common complication in IHRNI, and feeding problems are closely associated with motor and cognitive functions, highlighting the necessity of early detection and intervention of nutritional deficits.14 Although precise data on the incidence of undernutrition in IHRNI is lacking, these infants are at increased risk of developing undernutrition. IHRNI often suffer from swallowing disorders, feeding difficulties, or digestive dysfunction resulting in deficiencies in nutritional intake while hypertonia exacerbates nutrient consumption. Undernutrition would further influence their neurodevelopment. Therefore, it is recommended to monitor the nutritional status of IHRNI and their functional development in motor, cognition, language, and feeding, aiming for the early detection of abnormalities and timely targeted interventions.15 Recommendation 2: Detailed neurological examination and developmental assessments should be performed for high-risk infants or infants who are suspected to have neurological impairments upon screening. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound should be conducted for individuals with abnormal examination. Early intervention and regular follow-up are recommended for those with detected neurological impairments. (Level I evidence, Grade A recommendation) High-risk infants might include neonates and infants who were born prematurely, with low birth weight, a history of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, or those who were treated at the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for other conditions. Infants with developmental delays might be identified by regular screening or caregiver reports. All of these infants should complete detailed neurological examination and developmental assessment. Further neurological imaging would be needed in cases with abnormal results.1, 16 The expert panel recommended Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) to be used since it has been shown to be a reliable and valid tool for detecting neurological impairment. It has a sensitivity of over 90% and a specificity of over 85% for predicting cerebral palsy.1 HINE has also been shown to have a good predicting value of cognitive impairments.17-19 In the neonatal period, Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination (HNNE) could be used for detecting motor delay, but its sensitivity and specificity for neurological impairment are unclear.20 As for motor performance, assessment tools that focus on abnormal features of neurological impairment and have good predictive values in long-term outcomes should be chosen. Prechtl's Assessment of General Movements (GMs) is recommended for assessing infants’ spontaneous movement under the adjusted age of 5 months with 98% sensitivity and 91% specificity for predicting cerebral palsy.1 In addition, the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) and Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) could help differentiate infants with delayed gross motor skills from typically developing peers. We also recommend regular follow-ups for both high-risk infants and infants with developmental delays using standardized assessments like Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III (Bayley-III) and Griffiths Scale of Child Development, to track their development in motor, cognition, language, and social behaviors.21 Neuroimaging, preferably brain MRI, is recommended when the infant is found to have abnormalities in neurological examination and functional assessments. A previous study found that abnormal brain MRI results 1 week after birth predicted a poor prognosis (neurological impairment or mortality) with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 86%–89%.16 When brain MRI is not feasible, cranial ultrasound could be employed for those with open fontanelles.22 However, a subsequent MRI should be conducted when possible. Early evaluation of social and emotional development is difficult since differences between typically developing infants and infants at high risk of neurodevelopmental disorders might not be easily identified before 6 months. We recommend the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales (CSBS) and Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) for early screening after the age of 6 months.23 The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS) might recognize neurodevelopmental delays and problematic behaviors during the neonatal period, especially in neonates at high risk of chemical exposure. Previous studies indicated that it also has predictive value for neurodevelopment and behavior at the age of 2 years.9, 24, 25 Among the assessment tools for neurological impairment, the GMs, HINE, and MRI are the most effective methods available for predicting cerebral palsy. Specifically, MRI performed at term corrected age had a sensitivity range of 86%–100% and specificity of 87%–97% in predicting cerebral palsy,26 and MRI evidence of moderate to severe cerebral white-matter damage indicated severe cognitive impairment and cerebral palsy.27 Cranial ultrasound findings of intraventricular hemorrhage levels III and IV have also been associated with severe cognitive impairment and paraventricular leukomalacia.27 HINE combined with MRI could achieve a predictive value of 90% or greater for cerebral palsy.1 A total HINE score below 57 at the adjusted age of 3 months or below 65 at 12 months indicates a risk of cerebral palsy, and a total score below 40 suggests a risk of severe cerebral palsy.28 Further, HINE could anticipate subtypes of cerebral palsy as a total score of 50–73 along with an asymmetry score of 5 or above indicating hemiplegia, while a score below 50 indicates diplegia and quadriplegia.28 In addition to cerebral palsy, a lower HINE score might also indicate potential developmental delay.29 Romeo et al.30 found that children who had stayed at the NICU for medical care were rarely able to achieve optimal scores among the same-aged infants at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The GMs combined with brain MRI could identify cerebral palsy with a predictive value of 95%–98%.1, 26 Infants who present with a series of cramped-synchronized general movements and the absence of fidget movements are at high risk of cerebral palsy.31 A follow-up study on premature infants discovered that those with abnormal GMs results at 3 months exhibited worse motor and cognitive outcomes than infants with normal GMs.32 The Bayley-III test could reflect delays in cognition, motor, language, adaptive behaviors, and social interaction. Once delays are detected, early intervention for these infants should be implemented. However, its efficacy in predicting development delays at late childhood or early school age is somewhat limited.21 The risk for cerebral palsy increases if the infant exhibits abnormal GMs or HINE and is born with high-risk factors, or presents an abnormal brain MRI. For infants with normal brain MRI and without high-risk medical history, follow-up, and early interventions are still necessary if their GMs or HINE show anomalies. Recommendation 3: Early rehabilitation might promote the development of motor and cognitive skills in IHRNI. It could effectively alleviate the severity of cerebral palsy, and reduce or prevent secondary complications associated with cerebral palsy. (Level I evidence, Grade A recommendation) Early rehabilitation could enhance functional outcomes for IHRNI, notably in motor and cognitive functions. It might also reduce and prevent secondary complications and improve the prognosis for infants who are later diagnosed with cerebral palsy.3 The fetal period and the first two years of life undergo active brain development and exhibit the highest degree of neuroplasticity, further emphasizing that early rehabilitation is pivotal for improving the prognosis of IHRNI.16 Morgan et al.33 demonstrated that the implementation of the goals-activities-motor enrichment approach could improve both motor and cognitive outcomes in high-risk infants with cerebral palsy. Eliasson et al.34 discovered that introducing baby constraint-induced movement therapy (baby-CIMT) before the age of 12 months could enhance hand function in IHRNI, potentially leading to a better prognosis in manual ability. A study found that the CIMT might enhance the hand function of hemiplegic mice by promoting the remodeling of neurons, neurofilaments, dendrites/axon areas, and myelin in the motor cortex.35 Dusing et al.36 observed that early physical therapy based on parent-child interaction could enhance both motor and cognitive functions in children with motor delay. Recommendation 4: Early rehabilitation for IHRNI should be timely and specific, emphasizing the active involvement of the family. (Level I evidence, Grade A recommendation) Based on current research evidence, effective early rehabilitation training for IHRNI should adhere to the following principles5: (a) Early initiation: Rehabilitation should begin as soon as neurological impairment is suspected to avoid missing the critical period of neuroplasticity; (b) Targeted and task-oriented training: Treatment should be selected based on infants’ age, specific needs, and assessment results; (c) Active involvement of family: Modifying the family environment and enhancing interactions between family members and the infant could facilitate the and development of motor, cognitive, and other related Recommendation The motor and cognitive therapy have been effective (Level I evidence, Grade A and language developmental care in feeding and interventions to comorbidities are also with evidence of (Level evidence, Grade recommendation) To improve the functional of IHRNI, recommend promoting motor, cognitive, language, and social development to prevent or secondary Based on the current evidence, the following interventions are (a) motor training: This should be the age and of It should to that the are performed (b) and intensive training: These are the optimal interventions for infants at high risk of to improve manual ability. We that infants at high risk of daily intensive with active for at 6 (c) This should be task-oriented and focus on involvement an and training incorporating cognitive, language, motor, and social interaction and These should focus on promoting the development of skills such as emotional and care in should be on and is crucial in the implementation of developmental care in the This feeding posture, and an approach to feeding, which could help improve the and of However, it is to and when developmental care in the It is to prevent or reduce comorbidities at the early stage, such as and impairments, and This the of motor and daily Recommendation management could and gain in IHRNI, and improve the development of motor, cognitive, language, and (Level evidence, Grade recommendation) IHRNI are often by swallowing disorders, feeding difficulties, cognitive impairments, and hypertonia, which cause nutritional intake and increased consumption. Consequently, the risk of undernutrition might be which could have on the and A cohort study found that infants to a of in neurodevelopmental outcomes along with their nutritional status at 6 months but infants in the group of severe and no had scores by an of in neurodevelopmental assessment compared to their and found that undernutrition negatively brain structure and neurodevelopmental and targeted nutritional management could these in the brain and developmental delay, to the of neurological Recommendation IHRNI should nutritional on a risk of undernutrition be a comprehensive nutritional assessment and risk factors should be conducted to determine their needs for nutritional (Level I evidence, Grade A recommendation) The screening for risk of undernutrition in IHRNI should be timely and most of the available undernutrition risk screening tools are for and their sensitivity conditions has not been the and clinical recommend the of the on and and the Assessment to the undernutrition risk in status is mainly by weight, and such as and could also be under the In with the of the and incorporating the by the Society for and using to nutritional Based on these undernutrition is and leading to undernutrition in IHRNI could be two (a) nutritional intake and such as swallowing disorders, feeding difficulties, and and (b) increased to conditions like hypertonia and disorders and feeding difficulties are common in IHRNI. We recommend using the Neonatal Assessment the Neonatal Assessment the of the Assessment and the for and Scale for to these The swallowing study and the evaluation of swallowing are the for assessing swallowing as precise of the and swallowing should also the as daily of of for feeding, and feeding and any history of or This in feeding methods and Recommendation for IHRNI should be include of nutritional needs, of nutritional of and feeding and swallowing (Level I evidence, Grade A recommendation) For infants under the age of 12 using to The daily intake should be to the the for The for and related 0 to 3 while 3 to 6 and 60 6 to the for is 16 compared to for to 12 to while to 14 Infants with mild undernutrition might an of the daily while infants with moderate undernutrition an and infants with severe undernutrition an For neonates at risk of neurological impairment, the nutrient intake should be by since the neonates might have complex feeding is the method for infants with good feeding We improving their training in feeding skills and feeding is recommended for infants with a risk of or too long to or those with severe swallowing disorders, the for and of no gain over 3 If feeding is to under 6 the is the For those infants and delayed to a might be For feeding 6 using the for feeding, this is in a the and In the presence of complications like and delayed a to a or might be For infants with or permanent or an to or should be a when its complications are For infants without severe recommend (a) For with or infant in addition to (b) For infants via a or with to provide (c) For those on the regular to a could provide IHRNI with without the on their which is since these infants swallowing disorders, feeding and the nutritional and with are If any and nutritional Infants with severe should or under the guidance of a 5 and months of age, IHRNI should begin for those diagnosed with who should avoid The and should be and to their age as the infants show increased motor and swallowing The aims of feeding therapy are to enhance the and of feeding, facilitate the from to feeding, infants’ nutritional optimal and improve their quality of We (a) Modifying by to prevent (b) feeding by having the infants with (c) to improve feeding and with and for to above at Recommendation IHRNI often presents with functional complications or A comprehensive approach an medical specialists in and This should to a management the timely and enhancing the of early rehabilitation and nutritional (Level I evidence, Grade A recommendation) In this medical the rehabilitation a pivotal in this rehabilitation professionals should review the medical history, clinical and early detection of neurological impairment and be in early rehabilitation and nutritional management the of with infants and their if the infant other such as impairments, or a to the specialists should be Rehabilitation professionals should facilitate and that centered around the needs, and promote to intervention as to effective and Recommendation IHRNI should have of the motor, cognitive, and language development at months 3, 6, 9, and outcomes should be with follow-ups at age For motor language, cognitive, and follow-ups might to age 6 or school age. (Level I evidence, Grade A recommendation) and it is recommended to the motor, cognitive, and other functional outcomes of IHRNI at 2 years of age or et observed that cognitive at 6 months in infants with low birth was not a reliable for cognitive status at and found that cognitive interventions could enhance their functional outcomes. et in the study on high-risk that cognitive at 1 only as a general for at 2 years and age. This the importance of follow-ups school age to to the functional is also evidence among Early motor could predict cognitive functions, while cognitive and language are of For IHRNI, neurological early and nutritional management should be conducted after IHRNI should undergo follow-ups which include the implementation of the and We should also to neurodevelopmental in months of significant 3, 6, 9, and months of The clinical of these infants are often and their would be more and predicted by the age of 2 or Therefore, early rehabilitation and nutritional management should be and at the age of this age, prognosis could be and on to and the of follow-ups could be of higher skills in motor, language, cognition, and behavior to be age 6 or school age. in both the early and of IHRNI and in the standardized implementation of early rehabilitation and nutritional of the combined with research evidence, is crucial to these This consensus for early detection, and nutritional management for IHRNI. The is to that those at but not limited to infants with cerebral palsy, not the optimal of for early intervention, improving their functional outcomes. of the current research on infants at high risk of cerebral palsy, this consensus more on this which presents Additionally, this consensus recommendations for undernutrition, a among IHRNI. issues related to and deficiencies further and to of of of of to of General of Medical Medical Medical of and Medical Center for of and and and of of and Child and care Medical and of Medical and of of and of and to to Medical of and to of of of and Child and Child and of and Child of to of Medical Rehabilitation of Medical and Medical Medical We of and of for critical and on this consensus. The no of

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.