MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4399107623 · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106297

Strain and age but not maternal feeding of n-3 fatty acids affect the performance of laying hen offspring in a series of associative learning tasks

2024· article· en· W4399107623 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueApplied Animal Behaviour Science · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOffspringAffect (linguistics)Pet therapyAnimal-assisted therapyHUBzeroAssociative learningStrain (injury)PsychologyDevelopmental psychologyAnimal scienceCommunicationBiologyAnimal welfareCognitive psychologyEcologyAnatomyGeneticsPregnancy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Commercial poultry are typically fed diets with fatty acid compositions that differ considerably from wild-type diets in the omega-6 to omega-3 FA ratio (n-6: n-3). Maternal dietary n-3 FA have been shown to affect offspring brain development and cognition in various avian and mammalian species. This study explored the effects of feeding egg-type layer breeders with flaxseed on the performance of their female offspring in a three-stage discrimination task. Shaver White and ISA Brown breeders were fed either a control diet (n-6: n-3 = 14.7:1) or a flaxseed-enriched diet (n-6: n-3 = 5.3:1) throughout the rearing and laying phases. At 30 and 36 weeks of age, eggs were collected, incubated and hatched. Offspring were housed in enriched floor pens and received a control diet. At 12 (pullets) and 33 (hens) weeks of age, three learning tasks were conducted: behavioural shaping (N=437), discrimination test (N=350), and reversal learning (N=213). Food rewards (sweetcorn and raisins) were placed in the “reward” cup. Behavioural shaping consisted of five phases (P): P1 clear cup, P2 coloured cup, P3 coloured cup half-covered with a lid, P4 coloured cup three quarter covered with a lid, and P5 coloured cup covered with a lid. One cup, alternating between blue and green, was presented. Chickens had to eat the food reward from the cup in 4/5 trials to pass each phase. Two cups (green and blue) were presented during discrimination testing and reversal learning with food only in the predetermined “reward” cup. Learning criterion was choosing the correct cup in 4/5 trials for three consecutive days in discrimination testing and for two consecutive days in reversal learning. Data were analysed using survival class analyses. The hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) [LL, UL] and p-values to determine the probability of reaching learning criteria are reported. In P1 of behavioural shaping, Brown hens were likelier to reach criteria (HR=2.28, 95% CI [1.48, 3.55], p<0.001). For overall success in behavioural shaping (P1–5), hens were likelier to reach criteria than pullets (HR=2.42, 95% CI [1.50, 3.91], p<0.001). White chickens were likelier to reach criteria in the discrimination test than Brown chickens (HR=1.03, 95% CI [1.01, 1.75], p=0.04). Finally, pullets were likelier to reach criteria in reversal learning than hens (HR=0.44, 95% CI [0.23, 0.86], p=0.016). These results show that age, strain, and their interaction, but not maternal n-3 FA diet, affected the success of chickens in learning tasks. • Maternal omega-3 fatty acids diet did not affect learning ability of chickens. • Strain and age affected the participation of chickens in behavioural shaping. • Hens were more likely to complete behavioural shaping than pullets. • White hens were more likely to pass the discrimination task than brown hens. • Pullets were more likely to reach reversal learning criteria than hens.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,520
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,171

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,223 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle