MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4399121573 · doi:10.1353/bio.2023.a928384

False Summit: Gender in Mountaineering Nonfiction by Julie Rak (review)

2023· article· en· W4399121573 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueBiography · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueAdventure Sports and Sensation Seeking
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSummitMountaineeringHistoryGeographyArchaeologyCartography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: False Summit: Gender in Mountaineering Nonfiction by Julie Rak Denisa Krásná (bio) False Summit: Gender in Mountaineering Nonfiction Julie Rak McGill-Queen's University Press, 2021, 274 pp. ISBN 9780228006268, $140 hardcover; ISBN 9780228006275, $40.95 paperback. Julie Rak's False Summit: Gender in Mountaineering Nonfiction traverses the intersection of lifewriting studies and the emergent field of mountaineering studies, unraveling the complex relationship between gender, power, and representation in the climbing world. By examining traditional mountaineering narratives, Rak exposes the cultural construct of a "traditional mountaineering body," and its role in perpetuating gender disparities within the climbing community. She shows how mountaineering literature has glorified the heroic male climber figure that embodies physical strength, mental fortitude, and a "never back down" attitude. This ideal has contributed to the perception of climbing as primarily a masculine pursuit, which marginalizes women, disabled, and non-white climbers. [End Page 415] Rak's metaphor of the "false summit" poignantly captures the struggles of climbers who are not treated as legitimate mountaineers. Likewise, for Rak, in the context of climbing, the false summit symbolizes the challenges encountered by climbers who do not conform to the ideal perpetuated by mountaineering narratives. Rak shows that women, disabled, and non-white climbers often achieve remarkable feats, conquer significant challenges, and showcase exceptional skills, yet their accomplishments are overlooked or dismissed due to deeply ingrained gender, ableist, and racial biases. False Summit primarily focuses on the gendered aspects of climbing identity, showing how gender often becomes a defining aspect of one's mountaineering journey. Rak sheds light on the positioning of women and non-white climbers, who are often feminized as spectators rather than protagonists, and their representation as unwanted others invading masculine territory. Her analysis also reveals how some cisgender women climbers have adopted masculinist discourse, further complicating the landscape of gender dynamics in mountaineering. Rak draws a striking parallel between Margaret Thatcher and American climber Bev Johnson, both of whom have dismissed feminism and embraced a masculinist discourse in the pursuit of their own ambitions and "success." Rak challenges the Western understanding of success by demonstrating how the idea of achievement in mountaineering is not an objective, universal measure but rather a social construct influenced by dominant narratives that favor hypermasculinity and perpetuate hierarchies within climbing. Furthermore, Rak illustrates that mountaineering memoirs have become integral to the national imagination by folding climbing achievements into larger narratives of national identity and pride. These narratives often tie climbing accomplishments to nationalistic discourse and notions of imperialism and colonialism, symbolizing the desire for territorial dominance and symbolic power over nature. The book highlights the interplay between sovereignty, colonialism, capitalism, and the conquest of nature by centering on three iconic mountains: Annapurna, K2, and Mount Everest. Rak emphasizes the mountains not only as physical challenges but also as potent cultural and natural sites. In particular, Rak reveals how Mount Everest has been a focal point of colonial desire, with the name "Everest" itself a colonial imposition. The mountain has been portrayed as a territory to be "conquered," relegating local people to the role of serving imperial ambitions. To Rak, this conception of Everest raises questions of authenticity and belonging, because the narrative of who belongs on Everest has been shaped by colonial and racial biases. False Summit stands as a pivotal work within lifewriting studies, as it interrogates the field's relationship to mountaineering narratives. The book underscores how mountaineering accounts integrate the art of storytelling with the act of climbing, creating a narrative tapestry that merges lived experiences, truth claims, and memory. Rak focuses on the convergence of story and climbing, examining how these accounts serve as conduits bridging climbers with the larger world. The book underscores that writing about climbing is not peripheral but intrinsic to the [End Page 416] activity. These narratives, she argues, not only recount adventures but contribute to collective understandings of climbing, identity, and human relationships with the natural world. By elucidating the connection between climbing and nonfiction writing, the book reiterates the significance of narrative in shaping climbers' senses of self and purpose. As such, these narratives operate as more than just personal stories; they function as vital cultural artifacts that...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,181
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,512

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,309
Écart entre enseignants0,279 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle