MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4399121704 · doi:10.1353/bio.2023.a928390

Autobiography as Indigenous Intellectual Tradition: Cree and Métis âcimisowina by Deanna Reder (review)

2023· article· en· W4399121704 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueBiography · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAutobiographical and Biographical Writing
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousBiographyHistoryLiteratureArtArt historyBiologyEcology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Autobiography as Indigenous Intellectual Tradition: Cree and Métis âcimisowina by Deanna Reder Rachel Stubbs (bio) Autobiography as Indigenous Intellectual Tradition: Cree and Métis âcimisowina Deanna Reder Wilfred Laurier University Press, 2022, ix + 179 pp. ISBN 9781771125543, $34.99, paperback. In Autobiography as Indigenous Intellectual Tradition: Cree and Métis âcimisowina, Cree and Métis author Deanna Reder explores the extent to which autobiography constitutes a component of Indigenous literature. Reder currently works as an associate professor of Indigenous Studies and English at Simon Fraser University, which informs her research and writing. In Autobiography as Indigenous Intellectual Tradition, Reder argues that autobiography inherently lends itself to traditional Indigenous storytelling, contrary to decades of scholarship disregarding this form as a co-opted and inferior version of European genres. Indeed, Reder combats the interminable valuing of some forms of literature over others in academia and beyond. In asserting Indigenous autobiography as a critical literary tradition, Reder also partially addresses lingering questions in the academy regarding what, if anything, comprises the Turtle Island Indigenous literary canon. It is significant that Reder challenges the word "traditional," and asserts that "we come from oral and literary cultures" (133). Thus, Reder dismantles the widespread understanding in both the academic and public consciousness that Indigenous literary traditions are exclusively oral. Within the Indigenous autobiographical genre, Reder points towards an important and undervalued form in literary circles, âcimisowina, or Indigenous personal life stories. Within the six chapters of the book, Reder examines autobiographical writings from Anishinaabe writer George Copway, Cree writer James Settee, Métis writer Maria Campbell, Cree Anglican clergyman and writer Edward Ahenakew, Métis political activist and writer James Brady, and Cree lawyer and writer Harold Cardinal. In examining these autobiographical writings, Reder uncovers a rich Indigenous literary history that demonstrates a preference for autobiography as a form that allows for "an act of autonomy … that expresses the values of one's own story while at the same time an act of generosity, of sharing, that contributes to the history of the community" (18). Furthermore, in encountering pervasive academic disregard for these forms of autobiography, Reder identifies a gap in scholarship that uses a researcher's own âcimisowina "as a method of reorienting academic inquiry" (8). Reder employs this methodology throughout her text, demonstrating the theoretical efficacy of her own âcimisowina. Indeed, the book's strength lies in its ability to act as its own example of her theoretical framework. Each chapter opens with Reder's own âcimisowina, narratives that emphasize subjectivity, a position of listening. Reder suggests that perhaps one of the most important aspects of applying âcimisowina to research practices is developing the ability to listen: "While not overly didactic … from family storytelling I learned about the need to listen" (7). In each chapter, Reder details her [End Page 437] personal experience of a story—that is, Reder offers her readers stories about stories. In Chapter One, Reder describes listening to her mother's stories growing up, and in Chapter Two, Reder recalls hearing conflicting stories from her relatives about Indigenous identity politics. In these accounts, Reder puts her thesis into practice: seemingly innocuous Indigenous life stories matter, and they serve as "examples of vibrant, innovative Indigenous intellectual production" (29). Reder's own âcimisowina demonstrates this innovation, as she uses these stories to trace and complicate her own literary criticism. By applying personal understandings of stories to the research process, Reder offers a new, intensely personal method of examining Indigenous literatures, which emphasizes the experience of a text as a significant aspect of criticism and rejects Western appeals to objectivity. An example of Reder's practical theoretical application of âcimisowina occurs when she repeats stories. In the introduction, Reder details her mother's approach: "she rarely told the story in exactly the same way, but each time emphasized and re-emphasized different points" (7). Reder herself also clearly practices this form of storytelling. In Chapter One, Reder recounts a story of her kôhkom (grandmother) as a healer who cured a man from blindness, and in Chapter Three, Reder repeats the story, this time considering how her relatives understand the same story. Like her mother, Reder emphasizes different points in...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,206
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle