DHSI 2022 Conference & Colloquium Special Issue of IDEAH: Introduction
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
chaired by Caroline Winter (U Victoria).It was one of seven aligned conferences or events.As in the previous two years, the 2022 iteration of the Conference & Colloquium was held virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic.To facilitate participation across time zones, it featured pre-recorded conference presentations, digital posters showcased in an online exhibit, and live discussion of these materials.Additional conversations took place on twitter.comvia #DHSIConf and the general event hashtag #DHSI22.This special issue, which brings together a selection of papers arising out of the DHSI 2022-Online EditionConference & Colloquium, is the sixth such collection.In our introduction to the previous special issue, Lindsey Seatter, Caroline Winter, and I echoed many others before us by pointing out how, despite the pandemic, technology allowed members of our scholarly community to stay connected.Indeed, one of the unifying themes we identified for that special issue was "the role of infrastructure in shaping community" (Jensen, Seatter, and Winter).This year, we again observed the many ways that digital platforms and tools continued both to facilitate and to constrain connections between members of our dispersed networks.However, we were also struck by an apposite idea advanced during at least two of DHSI's Institute Lectures: digital infrastructure does connect people, but it may also be true that "infrastructure is people," as Leslie Chan remarked during his talk, "Is Open Scholarship Possible without Open Infrastructure?" (Chan; emphasis added).Chan's statement might conjure up images of precarious human pyramids or other acrobatic formations; more helpfully, and perhaps more to his point, we would argue that it serves as a helpful and necessary reminder of the human ingenuity, expertise, labour, and relationships that go into the creation and maintenance of digital infrastructure of any kind-of the tendency of infrastructure to be reliant on human factors.Chan illustrated this point with an image that, he noted, would likely resonate with many of us; indeed, some of us may identify with the lone researcher whose legacy project supports shaky digital infrastructure (Figure 1).For better or worse, then, we would echo Chan in asserting that if "infrastructure is people," it is also true that "infrastructure is relational."The question, perhaps, is how one can foster and maintain the human relationships that comprise digital infrastructure, ideally ensuring the long-term health and positive evolution of each.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle