Antivirals for treatment of severe influenza: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Summary Background The optimal antiviral drug for treatment of severe influenza remains unclear. To support updated WHO influenza clinical guidelines, this systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated antivirals for treatment of patients with severe influenza. Methods We systematically searched Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Global Health, Epistemonikos, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials published through 20 September 2023, that enrolled hospitalized patients with suspected or laboratory-confirmed influenza and compared direct-acting influenza antivirals against placebo, standard care, or another antiviral. We conducted frequentist network meta-analyses to summarize the evidence and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. We registered the protocol with PROSPERO, CRD42023456650. Findings Of 11,878 records, 8 trials with 1,424 participants were included. The effects of oseltamivir, peramivir or zanamivir on mortality compared with placebo or standard care without placebo for seasonal and zoonotic influenza are uncertain. Compared with placebo or standard care, oseltamivir (mean difference (MD) 1.63 days lower, 95% CI 2.81 lower to 0.45 lower) and peramivir (MD 1.73 days lower, 95% CI 3.33 lower to 0.13 lower) may reduce duration of hospitalization for seasonal influenza (low certainty evidence). There were few or no differences between oseltamivir (MD 0.34 days higher, 95% CI 0.86 lower to 1.54 higher; low certainty evidence), peramivir (MD 0.05 days lower, 95% CI 0.69 lower to 0.59 higher; low certainty evidence) and standard care in time to alleviation of symptoms. There were no differences in adverse events or serious adverse events among oseltamivir, peramivir and zanamivir (very low certainty evidence). Interpretation In hospitalized patients with severe influenza, oseltamivir and peramivir may reduce duration of hospitalization compared with standard care or placebo. The effects of all antivirals on mortality and other important patient outcomes are very uncertain. Funding WHO. Research in context Evidence before this study Antivirals are frequently used in the clinical management of people with severe influenza. Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported that early initiation of neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) treatment in hospitalized influenza patients may be associated with reduced mortality and length of hospital stay compared with later or no NAI treatment. However, these pairwise meta-analyses mainly focused on the relative effects of one specific class of antivirals (NAIs), did not evaluate the effects of antivirals on severe zoonotic influenza, and did not assess the certainty of evidence. No network meta-analysis has evaluated all available antiviral treatments for severe influenza. The optimal antiviral drug for treatment of patients with severe influenza remains uncertain. Added value of this study We found low certainty evidence that oseltamivir and peramivir may reduce the duration of hospitalization in patients with severe seasonal influenza compared with placebo or standard care. Great uncertainty remains regarding the effects of oseltamivir, peramivir, and zanamivir on mortality in patients with severe seasonal influenza or zoonotic influenza. There are no important differences in adverse events or serious adverse events associated with oseltamivir, peramivir, or zanamivir for treatment of patients with severe influenza, although the evidence is of very low certainty. The effects of other antivirals, including baloxavir, in patients with severe influenza, on mortality and other important patient outcomes are very uncertain. Implications of all the available evidence Our study provides evidence that oseltamivir and peramivir, relative to placebo or standard care, may reduce the duration of hospitalization for patients with severe seasonal influenza. These findings primarily highlight the uncertainty regarding effects of antivirals for treatment of patients with severe influenza but do provide some justification for their use.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,036 | 0,082 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,024 | 0,036 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,010 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».