MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4399152905 · doi:10.1353/his.2024.a928537

A Woman's Empire: Russian Women and Imperial Expansion in Asia by Kayta Hokanson (review)

2024· article· en· W4399152905 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Hana Staňková

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistoire sociale · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEmpireAncient historyHistoryPolitical scienceEconomic historyGender studiesSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: A Woman's Empire: Russian Women and Imperial Expansion in Asia by Kayta Hokanson Hana Stankova Hokanson, Kayta – A Woman's Empire: Russian Women and Imperial Expansion in Asia. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2023. 360 p. In A Woman's Empire, Katya Hokanson considers the perspective of nineteenth-century Russian women travellers in Central Asia, bringing to the fore aspects of the Russian conquest of Central Asia that have thus far gone unacknowledged due to scholars' predominant focus on men. Hokanson's book is organized in three parts, with the first considering imperial domesticity, the second focused on the context of the Great Game between the Russian and British Empires, and the third turning toward women scientists who explored Central Asia on behalf of the Russian Empire. Hokanson focuses on specific case studies of individual women, drawn from the surviving texts by and about them, to consider the diverse roles these Russian women played in the Russian Empire's nineteenth-century expansion into Central Asia. Hokanson recognizes the heterogeneity of these women's perspectives while also pointing out that they generally approached Central Asia as a colony in need of "civilization." They shared an interest in the rule of law, the legislation of women's rights, and the broader goal of competing with the British and encouraging further scientific progress. She situates these accounts in relation to the better-studied Russian literature about the Caucasus, where the "segmented and 'familiar' space" stood in contrast to the "less differentiated" land of Central Asia, allowing for Russian women to add unique perspectives and voices to the largely male canon (p. 5). At [End Page 198] the same time, she draws on previous scholarship about European women in British colonial settings to consider their complex and intersectional identities, which allowed them to take on the status of "honorary men" during the course of their travels, even as they also differentiated themselves from Europeans based on their belief that Russians treated the ethnic other "more fairly and humanely" (p. 8). Unlike male travellers in Central Asia, these women were more focused on the "process and interaction" that they observed rather than a finished colonial product (p. 16), had a heightened awareness of personal safety in this colonial space (p. 12), and had greater latitude in describing emotions than their male counterparts (p. 25). For all of these reasons, Hokanson's book makes it clear that these oft-ignored accounts are vital for a complete understanding of Russia's conquest of Central Asia. The first chapter of the first section, on authors who wrote "from within" the imperial endeavour, focuses on Varvara Dukhovskaia, the wife of a general, and later governor general, whose memoirs give insight into the perspective of a high-class Russian woman struggling with a sense of self-importance and resentment at having to live in this imperial periphery. Nevertheless, Dukhovskaia did take part in the "civilizing mission" through her patronage of music and her participation in ceremonial events. Dukhovskaia's text also touches on aspects of trans-imperial competition, given her meetings with other explorers from different countries and participation in the 1900 Paris Exposition Universelle, where she recounts the Western Europeans' disappointment to see that Russians were "simple mortals clad in European dress" (p. 69). In Chapter 2, the quasi-fictional Central Asian sketches of Elena Apreleva, who wrote under a male pseudonym, reveal greater sensitivity toward the changes that the Russians brought about for the local population. Apreleva was unusual in writing for a twofold audience of local Russian settlers in Turkestan and Russians in the imperial centre who were not familiar with the territory, and, through her fiction, implied that Russian rule was justified only insofar as it improved the lives of Central Asians, and especially women and oppressed minorities. She considers the cost of Russian rule for Russians themselves, drawing on the 17 years she spent in Turkestan herself. The third chapter introduces the second section on imperial rivalry with the British by shifting to the especially fascinating figure of Elena Blavatskaia. She is better known as Madame Blavatsky and was the co-founder of the Theosophical Society, as well as an Anglophobe...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHistoire socialeMême sujetHistorical Gender and Feminism StudiesTravaux en français237 207