MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4399164261 · doi:10.1353/his.2024.a928529

Winning Women's Hearts and Minds: Selling Cold War Culture in the US and the USSR by Diana Cucuz (review)

2024· article· en· W4399164261 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Alison Rowley

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistoire sociale · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEuropean history and politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCold warPolitical scienceEconomic historyHistoryLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Winning Women's Hearts and Minds: Selling Cold War Culture in the US and the USSR by Diana Cucuz Alison Rowley Cucuz, Diana – Winning Women's Hearts and Minds: Selling Cold War Culture in the US and the USSR. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2023. 317 p. Diana Cucuz's new book, Winning Women's Hearts and Minds, is a valuable contribution to the scholarship on Cold War culture. The study, which compares the contents of glossy magazines produced by both the Americans and the Soviets, underscores the extent to which the contours of idealized everyday life in their respective societies served as propaganda in the post–Second World War era. Cucuz argues that women were a crucial audience for these publications, not only because they were citizens of their countries but also owing to their central familial roles, which meant they influenced the thinking of future generations as well. Over the course of six chapters, she demonstrates what messages were presented to women and how these changed as the Cold War evolved. The book's first two chapters foreground Ladies' Home Journal, which Cucuz argues formed a template for Amerika, an American magazine produced for a Soviet audience, when it was revived by the United States Information Agency (USIA) in the 1950s. Ladies' Home Journal promoted a world inhabited by middle-class, White mothers who were content to be housewives. While these women did not seek employment, they were presented as politically active, particularly when it came to issues such as education—then seen as vital to protect against the attractions of communism—and civil defence at the local level. At the same time, the magazine sought to inform readers about the lives of Soviet women. Here, the coverage changed depending on fluctuations in US foreign policy, with a positive line evident during the Second World War but slowly giving way to a bleaker portrayal of Soviet everyday life as the Cold War deepened. In close readings of texts produced for the magazine by noted writer John Steinbeck, Lydia Kirk (the wife of the US Ambassador to the USSR from 1949 to 1951), and journalist Dorothy Thompson, Cucuz shows readers how Ladies' Home Journal explained why so many Soviet women needed to work, how that could affect their parenting, and how women's lives were adversely affected by a consistent lack of consumer goods. In the end, as she puts it, the "comparison was clear: under a Soviet regime, government dictated the manufacture, availability, and price of all products, to the detriment of women, but under a US system of government, the female consumer was boss" (p. 89). In Chapter 3, Cucuz explains how the US government came to be more interested in public diplomacy, which was assumed could shape opinions and policy formation in other countries, and it provides a short publication history of Amerika. Cucuz argues a pivotal moment for both came when President Eisenhower set up the USIA in August 1953. Four goals guided its work: first, to persuade people around the world that their interests matched US ambitions; second, to inform people of US stances on major issues; third, to ensure that officials based abroad should be flexible enough to adapt information as needed to match local situations; and finally, to provide information that would be seen as truthful and reliable rather than over-the-top. To reach Soviet women, the USIA relied on Amerika, whose contents are analyzed and contrasted with rival USSR (which aimed to inform American women [End Page 180] about Soviet life) over the next three chapters. As Cucuz outlines in Chapter 4, a typical 1950s issue of Amerika had 15–23 articles spread across roughly 60 glossy pages. No editorials were included, and hard politics were deliberately avoided in the articles. Instead, coverage focused on four themes when it came to women: fashion and femininity; marriage, motherhood, and family; domesticity; and consumption. By contrast, the Soviet government's stance—as presented in the pages of USSR—emphasized the ways in which people were willing to sacrifice for a more equitable society and argued that women (who had support from the state in the form of maternity leave...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,023

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHistoire socialeMême sujetEuropean history and politicsTravaux en français237 207