Risk of subsequent primary cancers among adult cancer survivors.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
10554 Background: Improvements in early detection and clinical management of cancers have led to a significant increase in long-term cancer survivors who may be at an elevated risk of developing a subsequent primary cancer (SPC). As the largest and most comprehensive analysis in Canada, we assessed the risks and patterns of SPC development among 134,693 adult cancer survivors with 852,661 person-years of follow-up. Methods: We used data from the Alberta Cancer Registry (ACR) to identify all first primary cancers (FPC) occurring between 2004 and 2015 to allow for adequate follow-up until December 31, 2020. A SPC was considered as the next primary cancer occurring in a different organ/site. We estimated incidence rates (IR) and standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for SPC development with 95% confidence intervals (CI). IRs were estimated as the observed number of SPC divided by the person-years of follow-up. SIRs were estimated as the observed number of SPC (O) divided by the expected number of SPC (E), where E is a weighted-sum of the general population-based year-age-sex-specific incidence rates and the corresponding person-years of follow-up among the adult cancer survivors. Results: The risk of developing a SPC up to fifteen years after an initial cancer was 16.1% for males and 12.3% for females. These risk estimates varied considerably by initial cancer site. Survivors of initial head and neck cancers had a fifteen-year cumulative incidence of 21.3% and a 2.5-fold relative risk of SPC development. Overall, both males (SIR=1.50) and females (SIR=1.64) had an increased risk of developing a SPC. Both male and female survivors of a FPC were at a significantly increased relative risk of developing a screen-detectable SPC (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung). There were significant increases in SPC risk for nearly all age groups, with a greater than 5-fold increase for survivors of early-onset cancers diagnosed between ages 18 to 39. Conclusions: Cancer survivors of nearly every FPC site had substantially increased risk of a SPC, compared to the cancer risk in the general population. Screen-detectable cancers were common SPC sites and this highlights the need to develop evidence-based guidelines for cancer screening in the growing population of long-term cancer survivors.[Table: see text]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».