Impact of an objective scoring system on initiation of therapy in patients with International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System (INRGSS) stage MS neuroblastoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
10003 Background: A subset of children with INRGSS Stage MS neuroblastoma (NBL) may be observed without treatment, while others have rapidly evolving symptoms that can be life-threatening. ANBL1232 adapted a previously developed semi-quantitative objective scoring system (OSS) to assign a numeric value to symptoms and laboratory abnormalities. The goal was to standardize monitoring, therapy initiation, and treatment duration in this cohort. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed Stage MS NBL were eligible for this prospective trial. An OSS score (OSSS) was assigned at enrollment; the total number was based on scoring in 5 systems: gastrointestinal (GI), respiratory, circulatory, renal, and hepatic. Within the 5 systems, individual clinical and laboratory parameters were scored as not present = 0, mild/moderate = 1 [Grade 2 CTCAEv4.0 adverse event (AE)] or severe = 2 (Grade ≥3 AE). The OSSS was the sum of highest score within each organ system (maximum score: 2 per system, 10 total). Asymptomatic MS patients with an OSSS < 2 who were either < 3 months (mo) of age without hepatomegaly or 3-18 mo of age with favorable biology tumors were eligible for observation without initial treatment. Observed patients underwent monthly physical examinations and laboratory assessments for the first 6 mo following diagnosis. Tumor imaging was performed every 3 mo for 1 year, then every 6-12 mo through 36 mo. An OSSS ≥2 or a protocol-defined increase in primary tumor size prompted initiation of therapy. Results: From July 2014 to February 2021, 89 eligible and evaluable patients with newly diagnosed stage MS NBL enrolled. Among these, 18 (20.2%; 5 male and 13 female) were eligible for observation. Observed patients were older at diagnosis (median age: 2.87 vs. 1.81 mo, p = 0.23) and more likely to have primary tumors without image-defined risk factors (62.5% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.0166) than those assigned to therapy up front. Nearly all observed patients (17/18) had abdominal/adrenal primaries. The initial OSSS was 0 in all observed patients. Median reported observation time was 36 mo (range: 1-36 mo); 13 patients completed all required monthly assessments for the first 6 mo. No patients in the observation cohort required initiation of therapy for an increase in OSSS. One patient with OSSS = 1 at mo 3 had complete GI symptom resolution by mo 5. Conclusions: An OSSS of 0 at diagnosis can aid in identifying a favorable group of patients with stage MS NBL who can be safely observed. No patients in the observation cohort developed evidence of organ dysfunction or OSSS > 1 despite frequent physical examination and comprehensive laboratory testing, suggesting that follow up may be safely liberalized in this population over time. Clinical and laboratory criteria implemented at diagnosis could be used to identify patients requiring prompt treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT02176967 .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».