MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4399300771 · doi:10.47191/ijmscrs/v4-i05-34

Effectiveness of Teaching Communication Skills in Undergraduate Curriculum at Defence Services Medical Academy Myanmar: Mixed Qualitative and Quantitative Study

2024· article· en· W4399300771 sur OpenAlexaff
Khin Phyu Pyar, Thant Zin Lynn, Thein Nay Lin, Nyan Naing Soe, Ye Min Thu, Sai Naing, Zar Ni Htet Aung, Nyan Lin Maung, Thein Aung Moe, Aung Phyo Latt, Saw Thar Wah, Myo Thant Kyaw, Win Min Tun, Zay Phyo Aung, Sitt Min, Aung Htoo Kyaw, Sai Su Phone

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiquePatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Établissements canadiensNational Defence Medical Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInternshipThematic analysisMedical educationCLARITYFocus groupCurriculumCornerstonePsychologyCommunication skillsQualitative researchHealth careMedicinePedagogySociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Good communication is the cornerstone of quality healthcare and it should be patient centered. Communication skills is taught and assessed with surrogates in undergraduate training. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of communication skills taught in undergraduate period in reality. Methodology: It was a combined qualitative and quantitative methods. For qualitative assessment, phenomenology was used. Informal focus group semi-structured interview was done to groups of interns who had completed internship at medical wards. The responses were analyzed interpreted and classified; thematic analysis was done. For quantitative assessments, open ended questions were set by experts in medical education. The questions were answered anonymously; they were grouped into same themes. This study was approved by ‘Hospital Research and Ethics Committee’ of No(1) Defence Services General Hospital. Informed consent was taken from each intern. Results: A total 20 interns were included. Four themes were formed after thematic analysis: (1) the extent of applicability of communication skills they were taught in undergraduate days;(2) self-admitted confidence and degree of satisfaction; (3) the challenges/gaps they faced in reality; and (4) their suggestions on undergraduate teaching to fill the gaps. All interns admitted that the communication skills they taught was 100% applicable in practice. And they were confident out of proportion to their medical experience. They were satisfied with communication skills they were taught in undergraduate days. The challenges faced were as follows; difficulty in understanding volume and clarity of language when dealing with some nationality; low education level of patients leading to difficulty in understanding the information they have given; difficulty in getting trust from patient being youngest doctor in the team; and, taking long time due to emotional reaction of patient in breaking bad news. They admitted that they need to fill their knowledge gaps to answer the questions raised by patients particularly in explanation of diagnosis and management. They realized the importance of facial expression and tone of voice to express sympathy and empathy especially in breaking bad news. To improve communication skills in practice, they suggested to teach with real patients with real scenario. Conclusion: Teaching communication skills in undergraduate period was effective. The interns had good self-reported confidence. The interns need more training and self-directed learning. The challenges faced by interns were acceptable/logical. We should find better teaching method/media in undergraduate teaching to promote communication skills.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,092
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,109
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesMétarecherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,358
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0920,109
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,004
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,469
Tête enseignante GPT0,708
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research StudiesMême sujetPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareTravaux en français237 207